From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/8] f2fs: avoid data race between FI_DIRTY_INODE flag and update_inode
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 20:55:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1464926139-58252-6-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464926139-58252-1-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
FI_DIRTY_INODE flag is not covered by inode page lock, so it can be unset
at any time like below.
Thread #1 Thread #2
- lock_page(ipage)
- update i_fields
- update i_size/i_blocks/and so on
- set FI_DIRTY_INODE
- reset FI_DIRTY_INODE
- set_page_dirty(ipage)
In this case, we can lose the latest i_field information.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/inode.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
index fb3d9bd..63c4326 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
@@ -231,6 +231,8 @@ int update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *node_page)
{
struct f2fs_inode *ri;
+ f2fs_inode_synced(inode);
+
f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(node_page, NODE, true);
ri = F2FS_INODE(node_page);
@@ -265,7 +267,6 @@ int update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *node_page)
__set_inode_rdev(inode, ri);
set_cold_node(inode, node_page);
- f2fs_inode_synced(inode);
/* deleted inode */
if (inode->i_nlink == 0)
--
2.6.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-03 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-03 3:55 [PATCH 1/8] f2fs: reuse nid if it was cached only Jaegeuk Kim
2016-06-03 3:55 ` [PATCH 2/8] f2fs: remove deprecated parameter Jaegeuk Kim
2016-06-03 3:55 ` [PATCH 3/8] f2fs: avoid wrong count on dirty inodes Jaegeuk Kim
2016-06-03 3:55 ` [PATCH 4/8] f2fs: skip roll_forward recovery after umount Jaegeuk Kim
2016-06-03 3:55 ` [PATCH 5/8] f2fs: remove obsolete parameter in f2fs_truncate Jaegeuk Kim
2016-06-03 3:55 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2016-06-03 3:55 ` [PATCH 7/8] f2fs: fix wrong percentage Jaegeuk Kim
2016-06-03 3:55 ` [PATCH 8/8] f2fs: control not to exceed # of cached nat entries Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1464926139-58252-6-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome