From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751119AbcFDAji (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2016 20:39:38 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:35372 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750726AbcFDAjg (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2016 20:39:36 -0400 From: Hugh Sipiere To: m@bues.ch Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Sipiere Subject: [PATCH] Drivers: ssb: Fix bare unsigned and changed to trailing comments Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 01:39:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1465000772-1447-1-git-send-email-hgsipiere@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.5.5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I changed drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c to better fit the coding style. I changed unsigned to unsigned int Two comments were changed to not end on a line with the text. Signed-off-by: Hugh Sipiere --- drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c b/drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c index 180e027..49f858c 100644 --- a/drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c +++ b/drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ **************************************************/ #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SSB_EMBEDDED) -static int ssb_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio) +static int ssb_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio) { struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip); @@ -38,14 +38,14 @@ static int ssb_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio) * ChipCommon **************************************************/ -static int ssb_gpio_chipco_get_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio) +static int ssb_gpio_chipco_get_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio) { struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip); return !!ssb_chipco_gpio_in(&bus->chipco, 1 << gpio); } -static void ssb_gpio_chipco_set_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio, +static void ssb_gpio_chipco_set_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio, int value) { struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip); @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void ssb_gpio_chipco_set_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio, } static int ssb_gpio_chipco_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, - unsigned gpio) + unsigned int gpio) { struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip); @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int ssb_gpio_chipco_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, } static int ssb_gpio_chipco_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, - unsigned gpio, int value) + unsigned int gpio, int value) { struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip); @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static int ssb_gpio_chipco_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, return 0; } -static int ssb_gpio_chipco_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio) +static int ssb_gpio_chipco_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio) { struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip); @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int ssb_gpio_chipco_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio) return 0; } -static void ssb_gpio_chipco_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio) +static void ssb_gpio_chipco_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio) { struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip); @@ -231,7 +231,8 @@ static int ssb_gpio_chipco_init(struct ssb_bus *bus) chip->ngpio = 16; /* There is just one SoC in one device and its GPIO addresses should be * deterministic to address them more easily. The other buses could get - * a random base number. */ + * a random base number. + */ if (bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB) chip->base = 0; else @@ -256,14 +257,14 @@ static int ssb_gpio_chipco_init(struct ssb_bus *bus) #ifdef CONFIG_SSB_DRIVER_EXTIF -static int ssb_gpio_extif_get_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio) +static int ssb_gpio_extif_get_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio) { struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip); return !!ssb_extif_gpio_in(&bus->extif, 1 << gpio); } -static void ssb_gpio_extif_set_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio, +static void ssb_gpio_extif_set_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio, int value) { struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip); @@ -281,7 +282,7 @@ static int ssb_gpio_extif_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, } static int ssb_gpio_extif_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, - unsigned gpio, int value) + unsigned int gpio, int value) { struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip); @@ -424,7 +425,8 @@ static int ssb_gpio_extif_init(struct ssb_bus *bus) chip->ngpio = 5; /* There is just one SoC in one device and its GPIO addresses should be * deterministic to address them more easily. The other buses could get - * a random base number. */ + * a random base number. + */ if (bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB) chip->base = 0; else -- 2.5.5