From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com, bsegall@google.com, pjt@google.com,
morten.rasmussen@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk
Subject: [RFC PATCH 03/11] sched: Introduce struct sched_domain_shared
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:49:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466041775-4528-4-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466041775-4528-1-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com>
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Since struct sched_domain is strictly per cpu; introduce a structure
that is shared between all 'identical' sched_domains.
Limit to SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES domains for now, as we'll only use it
for shared cache state; if another use comes up later we can easily
relax this.
While the sched_group's are normally shared between CPUs, these are
not natural to use when we need some shared state on a domain level --
since that would require the domain to have a parent, which is not a
given.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 6 ++++++
kernel/sched/core.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 1b43b45..f1233f54a 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1057,6 +1057,10 @@ extern int sched_domain_level_max;
struct sched_group;
+struct sched_domain_shared {
+ atomic_t ref;
+};
+
struct sched_domain {
/* These fields must be setup */
struct sched_domain *parent; /* top domain must be null terminated */
@@ -1125,6 +1129,7 @@ struct sched_domain {
void *private; /* used during construction */
struct rcu_head rcu; /* used during destruction */
};
+ struct sched_domain_shared *shared;
unsigned int span_weight;
/*
@@ -1158,6 +1163,7 @@ typedef int (*sched_domain_flags_f)(void);
struct sd_data {
struct sched_domain **__percpu sd;
+ struct sched_domain_shared **__percpu sds;
struct sched_group **__percpu sg;
struct sched_group_capacity **__percpu sgc;
};
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index c4596e0..59f8bf1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5845,6 +5845,8 @@ static void destroy_sched_domain(struct sched_domain *sd)
kfree(sd->groups->sgc);
kfree(sd->groups);
}
+ if (sd->shared && atomic_dec_and_test(&sd->shared->ref))
+ kfree(sd->shared);
kfree(sd);
}
@@ -6283,6 +6285,9 @@ static void claim_allocations(int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
WARN_ON_ONCE(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, cpu) != sd);
*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, cpu) = NULL;
+ if (atomic_read(&(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sds, cpu))->ref))
+ *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sds, cpu) = NULL;
+
if (atomic_read(&(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sg, cpu))->ref))
*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sg, cpu) = NULL;
@@ -6318,10 +6323,12 @@ static int sched_domains_curr_level;
SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN)
static struct sched_domain *
-sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl, int cpu)
+sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
+ const struct cpumask *cpu_map, int cpu)
{
- struct sched_domain *sd = *per_cpu_ptr(tl->data.sd, cpu);
- int sd_weight, sd_flags = 0;
+ struct sd_data *sdd = &tl->data;
+ struct sched_domain *sd = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, cpu);
+ int sd_id, sd_weight, sd_flags = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
/*
@@ -6375,6 +6382,9 @@ sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl, int cpu)
#endif
};
+ cpumask_and(sched_domain_span(sd), cpu_map, tl->mask(cpu));
+ sd_id = cpumask_first(sched_domain_span(sd));
+
/*
* Convert topological properties into behaviour.
*/
@@ -6389,6 +6399,9 @@ sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl, int cpu)
sd->cache_nice_tries = 1;
sd->busy_idx = 2;
+ sd->shared = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sds, sd_id);
+ atomic_inc(&sd->shared->ref);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
} else if (sd->flags & SD_NUMA) {
sd->cache_nice_tries = 2;
@@ -6410,7 +6423,7 @@ sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl, int cpu)
sd->idle_idx = 1;
}
- sd->private = &tl->data;
+ sd->private = sdd;
return sd;
}
@@ -6717,6 +6730,10 @@ static int __sdt_alloc(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
if (!sdd->sd)
return -ENOMEM;
+ sdd->sds = alloc_percpu(struct sched_domain_shared *);
+ if (!sdd->sds)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
sdd->sg = alloc_percpu(struct sched_group *);
if (!sdd->sg)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -6727,6 +6744,7 @@ static int __sdt_alloc(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
for_each_cpu(j, cpu_map) {
struct sched_domain *sd;
+ struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
struct sched_group *sg;
struct sched_group_capacity *sgc;
@@ -6737,6 +6755,13 @@ static int __sdt_alloc(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, j) = sd;
+ sds = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct sched_domain_shared),
+ GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(j));
+ if (!sds)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sds, j) = sds;
+
sg = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct sched_group) + cpumask_size(),
GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(j));
if (!sg)
@@ -6776,6 +6801,8 @@ static void __sdt_free(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, j));
}
+ if (sdd->sds)
+ kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sds, j));
if (sdd->sg)
kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sg, j));
if (sdd->sgc)
@@ -6783,6 +6810,8 @@ static void __sdt_free(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
}
free_percpu(sdd->sd);
sdd->sd = NULL;
+ free_percpu(sdd->sds);
+ sdd->sds = NULL;
free_percpu(sdd->sg);
sdd->sg = NULL;
free_percpu(sdd->sgc);
@@ -6794,11 +6823,10 @@ struct sched_domain *build_sched_domain(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *attr,
struct sched_domain *child, int cpu)
{
- struct sched_domain *sd = sd_init(tl, cpu);
+ struct sched_domain *sd = sd_init(tl, cpu_map, cpu);
if (!sd)
return child;
- cpumask_and(sched_domain_span(sd), cpu_map, tl->mask(cpu));
if (child) {
sd->level = child->level + 1;
sched_domain_level_max = max(sched_domain_level_max, sd->level);
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-16 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-16 1:49 [RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor select_task_rq_fair() Yuyang Du
2016-06-16 1:49 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] sched: Remove unused @cpu argument from destroy_sched_domain*() Yuyang Du
2016-06-16 1:49 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] sched: Restructure destroy_sched_domain() Yuyang Du
2016-06-16 1:49 ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2016-06-16 1:49 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] sched: Replace sd_busy/nr_busy_cpus with sched_domain_shared Yuyang Du
2016-06-16 1:49 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] sched: Rewrite select_idle_siblings() Yuyang Du
2016-06-16 1:49 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] sched: Optimize SCHED_SMT Yuyang Du
2016-06-16 1:49 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] sched: Clean up SD_BALANCE_WAKE flags in sched domain build-up Yuyang Du
2016-06-16 1:49 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] sched: Remove SD_WAKE_AFFINE flag and replace it with SD_BALANCE_WAKE Yuyang Du
2016-06-23 13:04 ` Matt Fleming
2016-06-23 13:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-23 14:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-06-16 1:49 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] sched: Add per CPU variable sd_socket_id to specify the CPU's socket Yuyang Du
2016-06-16 1:49 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] sched: Add sched_llc_complete static key to specify whether the LLC covers all CPUs Yuyang Du
2016-06-16 1:49 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] sched/fair: Refactor select_task_rq_fair() Yuyang Du
2016-06-16 1:57 ` Yuyang Du
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1466041775-4528-4-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com \
--to=yuyang.du@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®