mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>,
	John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>,
	laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, seanpaul@google.com,
	marcheu@google.com, m.chehab@samsung.com,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Subject: [RFC 0/5] rework fences on struct sync_file
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:29:45 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466695790-2833-1-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org> (raw)

From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

Hi all,

This is an attempt to improve fence support on Sync File. The basic idea
is to have only sync_file->fence and store all fences there, either as
normal fences or fence_arrays. That way we can remove some potential
duplication when using fence_array with sync_file: the duplication of the array
of fences and the duplication of fence_add_callback() for all fences. 

Now when creating a new sync_file during the merge process sync_file_set_fence()
will set sync_file->fence based on the number of fences for that sync_file. If
there is more than one fence a fence_array is created. One important advantage
approach is that we only add one fence callback now, no matter how many fences
there are in a sync_file - the individual callbacks are added by fence_array.

Two fence ops had to be created to help abstract the difference between handling
fences and fences_arrays: .teardown() and .get_fences(). The former run needed
on fence_array, and the latter just return a copy of all fences in the fence.
I'm not so sure about adding those two, speacially .get_fences(). What do you
think?

Please comment! Thanks.

	Gustavo
---

Gustavo Padovan (5):
  dma-buf/fence: add .teardown() ops
  dma-buf/fence-array: add fence_array_teardown()
  dma-buf/fence: add .get_fences() ops
  dma-buf/fence-array: add fence_array_get_fences()
  dma-buf/sync_file: rework fence storage in struct file

 drivers/dma-buf/fence-array.c        |  30 ++++++++
 drivers/dma-buf/fence.c              |  21 ++++++
 drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c          | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 drivers/staging/android/sync_debug.c |   5 +-
 include/linux/fence.h                |  10 +++
 include/linux/sync_file.h            |  12 ++--
 6 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

-- 
2.5.5

             reply	other threads:[~2016-06-23 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-23 15:29 Gustavo Padovan [this message]
2016-06-23 15:29 ` [RFC 1/5] dma-buf/fence: add .teardown() ops Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-23 20:48   ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-24 13:19     ` Gustavo Padovan
2016-07-12 10:51       ` Daniel Vetter
2016-06-23 15:29 ` [RFC 2/5] dma-buf/fence-array: add fence_array_teardown() Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-23 15:29 ` [RFC 3/5] dma-buf/fence: add .get_fences() ops Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-23 20:40   ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-12 10:52   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-06-23 15:29 ` [RFC 4/5] dma-buf/fence-array: add fence_array_get_fences() Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-23 20:35   ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-23 15:29 ` [RFC 5/5] dma-buf/sync_file: rework fence storage in struct file Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-23 21:27   ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-24 13:23     ` Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-24  9:27 ` [RFC 0/5] rework fences on struct sync_file Christian König
2016-06-24 13:17   ` Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-24 14:14     ` Christian König
2016-06-24 14:59       ` Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-24 15:09         ` Christian König
2016-06-24 15:19           ` Gustavo Padovan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1466695790-2833-1-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org \
    --to=gustavo@padovan.org \
    --cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniels@collabora.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ghackmann@google.com \
    --cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=marcheu@google.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=seanpaul@google.com \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®