From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>,
John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>,
laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, seanpaul@google.com,
marcheu@google.com, m.chehab@samsung.com,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Subject: [RFC 0/5] rework fences on struct sync_file
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:29:45 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466695790-2833-1-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org> (raw)
From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Hi all,
This is an attempt to improve fence support on Sync File. The basic idea
is to have only sync_file->fence and store all fences there, either as
normal fences or fence_arrays. That way we can remove some potential
duplication when using fence_array with sync_file: the duplication of the array
of fences and the duplication of fence_add_callback() for all fences.
Now when creating a new sync_file during the merge process sync_file_set_fence()
will set sync_file->fence based on the number of fences for that sync_file. If
there is more than one fence a fence_array is created. One important advantage
approach is that we only add one fence callback now, no matter how many fences
there are in a sync_file - the individual callbacks are added by fence_array.
Two fence ops had to be created to help abstract the difference between handling
fences and fences_arrays: .teardown() and .get_fences(). The former run needed
on fence_array, and the latter just return a copy of all fences in the fence.
I'm not so sure about adding those two, speacially .get_fences(). What do you
think?
Please comment! Thanks.
Gustavo
---
Gustavo Padovan (5):
dma-buf/fence: add .teardown() ops
dma-buf/fence-array: add fence_array_teardown()
dma-buf/fence: add .get_fences() ops
dma-buf/fence-array: add fence_array_get_fences()
dma-buf/sync_file: rework fence storage in struct file
drivers/dma-buf/fence-array.c | 30 ++++++++
drivers/dma-buf/fence.c | 21 ++++++
drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
drivers/staging/android/sync_debug.c | 5 +-
include/linux/fence.h | 10 +++
include/linux/sync_file.h | 12 ++--
6 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
--
2.5.5
next reply other threads:[~2016-06-23 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-23 15:29 Gustavo Padovan [this message]
2016-06-23 15:29 ` [RFC 1/5] dma-buf/fence: add .teardown() ops Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-23 20:48 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-24 13:19 ` Gustavo Padovan
2016-07-12 10:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-06-23 15:29 ` [RFC 2/5] dma-buf/fence-array: add fence_array_teardown() Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-23 15:29 ` [RFC 3/5] dma-buf/fence: add .get_fences() ops Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-23 20:40 ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-12 10:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-06-23 15:29 ` [RFC 4/5] dma-buf/fence-array: add fence_array_get_fences() Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-23 20:35 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-23 15:29 ` [RFC 5/5] dma-buf/sync_file: rework fence storage in struct file Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-23 21:27 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-24 13:23 ` Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-24 9:27 ` [RFC 0/5] rework fences on struct sync_file Christian König
2016-06-24 13:17 ` Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-24 14:14 ` Christian König
2016-06-24 14:59 ` Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-24 15:09 ` Christian König
2016-06-24 15:19 ` Gustavo Padovan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1466695790-2833-1-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org \
--to=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniels@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ghackmann@google.com \
--cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=marcheu@google.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=seanpaul@google.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®