From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750796AbdEEQbR (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 May 2017 12:31:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35556 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750734AbdEEQbQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 May 2017 12:31:16 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 3A5FDC05974C Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rpeterso@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 3A5FDC05974C Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 12:31:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Bob Peterson To: Linus Torvalds Cc: cluster-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1467104190.4487433.1494001871746.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1764624605.4463543.1494001455155.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Subject: Regression in my latest GFS2 pull request MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.3.116.131, 10.4.195.2] Thread-Topic: Regression in my latest GFS2 pull request Thread-Index: EhSJfyYIu5iNsd0hFDXAhGwnCfROvQ== X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Fri, 05 May 2017 16:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, I see that you haven't processed my latest GFS2 pull request. Today I found a regression in one of those patches. I've written, tested, and posted a patch to cluster-devel to fix the problem, and I'd like to get it into this merge window because it's severe. (You can't unmount a gfs2 file system after withdraw due to errors). My question is: How would you like me to handle it? Push the new patch, tag it, and do a second pull request? Wait until you've processed the first pull request, then do so? Or is there a better way? Regards, Bob Peterson