mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: "snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
	"agk@redhat.com" <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dm: update table type check for dax
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:19:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467213538.3504.442.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160629004049.GA9721@redhat.com>

On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 20:40 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28 2016 at  4:23pm -0400,
> Kani, Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@hpe.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 16:07 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Jun 28 2016 at  3:37pm -0400,
> > > Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com> wrote:
> >  :
> > > 
> > > You said in the 0th header: "Patch 1 solves an error when lvremove is
> > > made to a snapshot device."
> > > 
> > > I'm not seeing why this patch 1 fixes anything specific to snapshot
> > > device removal (but I can see why patch 2 makes snapshot creation
> > > "work").  I'll apply your 2nd patch and see if I can see what you mean.
> > > 
> > > I actually see this error, without either of your 2 proposed patches
> > > applied, when I try to create a snapshot of a DAX capable LV:
> > > 
> > > # lvcreate -s -n snap -L 100M pmem/lv
> > >   device-mapper: reload ioctl on (253:7) failed: Invalid argument
> > >   Failed to lock logical volume pmem/lv.
> > >   Aborting. Manual intervention required.
> > > Jun 28 15:57:28 rhel-storage-02 kernel: device-mapper: ioctl: can't
> > > change device type after initial table load.
> >
> > Yes, patch 2 fixes this error.
> > 
> > I have not looked into why lvremove does this, but lvremove to a snapshot
> > device fails to reload DM table of "<dev>-lvsnap" device (which is marked
> > as DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED) with DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED.  Patch 1 fixes this
> > error.
>
> It looks like a strange intermediate state that lvm2 uses during
> snapshot removal.
> 
> Full listing of snapshot related DM tables (before lvremove):
> 
> pmem-lv-real: 0 6086656 linear 259:0 2048
> pmem-lv: 0 6086656 snapshot-origin 253:5
> pmem-snap-cow: 0 204800 linear 259:0 6088704
> pmem-snap: 0 6086656 snapshot 253:5 253:6 P 8
> 
> When removing this snapshot we're wanting to be left with:
> 
> pmem-lv: 0 6086656 linear 259:0 2048
> 
> I augmented the DM core error to be more expressive, resulting in:
>   device-mapper: ioctl: 253:7: can't change device type (from 1 to 4) after
> initial table load.
> 
> 1 is DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED and 4 is DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED -- which makes
> sense given the linear target is DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED.
> 
> The previous DM table for 253:7 was:
>   pmem-snap: 0 6086656 snapshot 253:5 253:6 P 8
> 
> The intermediate table that lvm2 is trying to load for 253:7 is:
>   0 204800 linear 259:0 6088704
> 
> (this linear target was previously pmem-snap-cow)

Yes, that is consistent with what I saw.

> > 
> > I think it also generally makes sense to allow this case.
>
> You're probably right but I need to think about it a little bit more.

Sounds good.

Thanks!
-Toshi

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-29 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-28 19:37 [PATCH 0/2] Support DAX for device-mapper dm-linear devices Toshi Kani
2016-06-28 19:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] dm: update table type check for dax Toshi Kani
2016-06-28 20:07   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-06-28 20:23     ` Kani, Toshimitsu
2016-06-29  0:40       ` Mike Snitzer
2016-06-29 15:19         ` Kani, Toshimitsu [this message]
2016-06-28 20:33   ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-28 19:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] dm snap: add fake origin_direct_access Toshi Kani
2016-06-28 20:27   ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-28 19:43 ` [PATCH 0/2] fix dm-snap for dax Kani, Toshimitsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1467213538.3504.442.camel@hpe.com \
    --to=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome