From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, luca.abeni@unitn.it, juri.lelli@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v3] sched/deadline: remove useless param from setup_new_dl_entity
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:28:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467977331-31116-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com> (raw)
setup_new_dl_entity() takes two parameters, but it only actually uses
one of them, under a different name, to setup a new dl_entity, after:
2f9f3fdc928 "sched/deadline: Remove dl_new from struct sched_dl_entity"
as we currently do
setup_new_dl_entity(&p->dl, &p->dl)
However, before Luca's change we were doing
setup_new_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se)
in update_dl_entity() for a dl_se->new entity: we were using pi_se's
parameters (the potential PI donor) for setting up a new entity.
Restore this behaviour (as we want to correctly initialize parameters of
a boosted task that enters DEADLINE) by removing the useless second
parameter of setup_new_dl_entity() and retrieving the top waiter
directly from inside that function.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
---
Changes from v2:
- optimize by calling rt_mutex_get_top_task only if the task is
boosted (as suggested by Steve)
Changes from v1:
- Steve pointed out that we were actually using the second parameter
to permorm initialization
- Luca confirmed that behavior is slightly changed w.r.t. before his
change
- changelog updated and original behavior restored
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index fcb7f0217ff4..7aeb21963d3c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -346,11 +346,12 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
* one, and to (try to!) reconcile itself with its own scheduling
* parameters.
*/
-static inline void setup_new_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
- struct sched_dl_entity *pi_se)
+static inline void setup_new_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
{
struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se);
struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq);
+ struct task_struct *pi_task;
+ struct sched_dl_entity *pi_se = dl_se;
WARN_ON(dl_time_before(rq_clock(rq), dl_se->deadline));
@@ -363,6 +364,15 @@ static inline void setup_new_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
return;
/*
+ * Use the scheduling parameters of the top pi-waiter task,
+ * if we have one from which we can inherit a deadline.
+ */
+ if (dl_se->dl_boosted &&
+ (pi_task = rt_mutex_get_top_task(dl_task_of(dl_se))) &&
+ dl_prio(pi_task->normal_prio))
+ pi_se = &pi_task->dl;
+
+ /*
* We use the regular wall clock time to set deadlines in the
* future; in fact, we must consider execution overheads (time
* spent on hardirq context, etc.).
@@ -1721,7 +1731,7 @@ static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
if (dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline, rq_clock(rq)))
- setup_new_dl_entity(&p->dl, &p->dl);
+ setup_new_dl_entity(&p->dl);
if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) {
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2016-07-08 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-08 11:28 Juri Lelli [this message]
2016-07-11 5:03 ` Xunlei Pang
2016-07-11 8:01 ` luca abeni
2016-07-11 8:16 ` Xunlei Pang
2016-07-11 9:22 ` luca abeni
2016-07-12 8:42 ` Juri Lelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1467977331-31116-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com \
--to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome