mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Oren Laadan <orenl@cellrox.com>,
	Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@google.com>,
	Rom Lemarchand <romlem@android.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>, Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com>,
	Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com>,
	Elliott Hughes <enh@google.com>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:50:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1468522244-28297-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> (raw)

When an interface to allow a task to change another tasks
timerslack was first proposed, it was suggested that something
greater then CAP_SYS_NICE would be needed, as a task could be
delayed further then what normally could be done with nice
adjustments.

So CAP_SYS_PTRACE was adopted instead for what became the
/proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns interface. However, for Android (where
this feature originates), giving the system_server
CAP_SYS_PTRACE would allow it to observe and modify all tasks
memory. This is considered too high a privilege level for only
needing to change the timerslack.

After some discussion, it was realized that a CAP_SYS_NICE
process can set a task as SCHED_FIFO, so they could fork some
spinning processes and set them all SCHED_FIFO 99, in effect
delaying all other tasks for an infinite amount of time.

So as a CAP_SYS_NICE task can already cause trouble for other
tasks, using it as a required capability for accessing and
modifying /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns seems sufficient.

Thus, this patch loosens the capability requirements to
CAP_SYS_NICE.

For ABI preservation, it still allows CAP_SYS_PTRACE tasks to
access/modify timerslack values, but I'm fine with removing
this if others agree.

Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Oren Laadan <orenl@cellrox.com>
Cc: Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@google.com>
Cc: Rom Lemarchand <romlem@android.com>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Cc: Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com>
Cc: Elliott Hughes <enh@google.com>
Cc: Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
---
 fs/proc/base.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index a11eb71..d32033e 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -2281,7 +2281,8 @@ static ssize_t timerslack_ns_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 	if (!p)
 		return -ESRCH;
 
-	if (ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_FSCREDS)) {
+	if (ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_FSCREDS) ||
+	    capable(CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
 		task_lock(p);
 		if (slack_ns == 0)
 			p->timer_slack_ns = p->default_timer_slack_ns;
@@ -2306,7 +2307,8 @@ static int timerslack_ns_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 	if (!p)
 		return -ESRCH;
 
-	if (ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_FSCREDS)) {
+	if (ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_FSCREDS) ||
+	    capable(CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
 		task_lock(p);
 		seq_printf(m, "%llu\n", p->timer_slack_ns);
 		task_unlock(p);
-- 
1.9.1

             reply	other threads:[~2016-07-14 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-14 18:50 John Stultz [this message]
2016-07-14 18:52 ` Kees Cook
2016-07-14 18:53   ` John Stultz
2016-07-14 19:55 ` Nick Kralevich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1468522244-28297-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ccross@android.com \
    --cc=dimitrysh@google.com \
    --cc=enh@google.com \
    --cc=kandoiruchi@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nnk@google.com \
    --cc=orenl@cellrox.com \
    --cc=romlem@android.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tkjos@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®