From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Oren Laadan <orenl@cellrox.com>,
Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@google.com>,
Rom Lemarchand <romlem@android.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>, Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com>,
Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com>,
Elliott Hughes <enh@google.com>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:50:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1468522244-28297-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> (raw)
When an interface to allow a task to change another tasks
timerslack was first proposed, it was suggested that something
greater then CAP_SYS_NICE would be needed, as a task could be
delayed further then what normally could be done with nice
adjustments.
So CAP_SYS_PTRACE was adopted instead for what became the
/proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns interface. However, for Android (where
this feature originates), giving the system_server
CAP_SYS_PTRACE would allow it to observe and modify all tasks
memory. This is considered too high a privilege level for only
needing to change the timerslack.
After some discussion, it was realized that a CAP_SYS_NICE
process can set a task as SCHED_FIFO, so they could fork some
spinning processes and set them all SCHED_FIFO 99, in effect
delaying all other tasks for an infinite amount of time.
So as a CAP_SYS_NICE task can already cause trouble for other
tasks, using it as a required capability for accessing and
modifying /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns seems sufficient.
Thus, this patch loosens the capability requirements to
CAP_SYS_NICE.
For ABI preservation, it still allows CAP_SYS_PTRACE tasks to
access/modify timerslack values, but I'm fine with removing
this if others agree.
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Oren Laadan <orenl@cellrox.com>
Cc: Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@google.com>
Cc: Rom Lemarchand <romlem@android.com>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Cc: Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com>
Cc: Elliott Hughes <enh@google.com>
Cc: Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index a11eb71..d32033e 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -2281,7 +2281,8 @@ static ssize_t timerslack_ns_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
if (!p)
return -ESRCH;
- if (ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_FSCREDS)) {
+ if (ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_FSCREDS) ||
+ capable(CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
task_lock(p);
if (slack_ns == 0)
p->timer_slack_ns = p->default_timer_slack_ns;
@@ -2306,7 +2307,8 @@ static int timerslack_ns_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
if (!p)
return -ESRCH;
- if (ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_FSCREDS)) {
+ if (ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_FSCREDS) ||
+ capable(CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
task_lock(p);
seq_printf(m, "%llu\n", p->timer_slack_ns);
task_unlock(p);
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-07-14 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-14 18:50 John Stultz [this message]
2016-07-14 18:52 ` Kees Cook
2016-07-14 18:53 ` John Stultz
2016-07-14 19:55 ` Nick Kralevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1468522244-28297-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org \
--to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=dimitrysh@google.com \
--cc=enh@google.com \
--cc=kandoiruchi@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nnk@google.com \
--cc=orenl@cellrox.com \
--cc=romlem@android.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®