From: kan.liang@intel.com
To: davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, gorcunov@openvz.org,
john.stultz@linaro.org, aduyck@mirantis.com, ben@decadent.org.uk,
decot@googlers.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
andi@firstfloor.org, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 27/30] net/netpolicy: fast path for finding the queues
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 23:56:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1468824984-65318-28-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1468824984-65318-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Current implementation searches the hash table to get assigned object
for each transmit/receive packet. It's not necessory, because the
assigned object usually remain unchanged.
This patch store the assigned queue into netpolicy_reg struct. So it
doesnot need to search the hash table everytime unless the system cpu
and queue mapping changed.
netpolicy_sys_map_version is used to track the system cpu and queue
mapping changes. It's protected by a rw lock (TODO: will replace by RCU
shortly).
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
---
include/linux/init_task.h | 3 +++
include/linux/netpolicy.h | 5 +++++
kernel/fork.c | 3 +++
net/core/netpolicy.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
net/core/sock.c | 6 ++++++
5 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/init_task.h b/include/linux/init_task.h
index eda7ffc..06ea231 100644
--- a/include/linux/init_task.h
+++ b/include/linux/init_task.h
@@ -189,6 +189,9 @@ extern struct task_group root_task_group;
.task_netpolicy.dev = NULL, \
.task_netpolicy.location = ~0, \
.task_netpolicy.rule_queue = ~0, \
+ .task_netpolicy.rx_queue = ~0, \
+ .task_netpolicy.tx_queue = ~0, \
+ .task_netpolicy.sys_map_version = 0, \
.task_netpolicy.ptr = (void *)&tsk,
#else
#define INIT_NETPOLICY(tsk)
diff --git a/include/linux/netpolicy.h b/include/linux/netpolicy.h
index 1cd5ac4..fa740b5 100644
--- a/include/linux/netpolicy.h
+++ b/include/linux/netpolicy.h
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ enum netpolicy_traffic {
#define POLICY_NAME_LEN_MAX 64
extern const char *policy_name[];
+extern int netpolicy_sys_map_version __read_mostly;
struct netpolicy_dev_info {
u32 rx_num;
@@ -86,6 +87,10 @@ struct netpolicy_reg {
void *ptr; /* pointers */
u32 location; /* rule location */
u32 rule_queue; /* queue set by rule */
+ /* Info for fast path */
+ u32 rx_queue;
+ u32 tx_queue;
+ int sys_map_version;
};
struct netpolicy_tcpudpip4_spec {
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 31262d2..fcb856b 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1456,6 +1456,9 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLICY
p->task_netpolicy.location = ~0;
p->task_netpolicy.rule_queue = ~0;
+ p->task_netpolicy.rx_queue = ~0;
+ p->task_netpolicy.tx_queue = ~0;
+ p->task_netpolicy.sys_map_version = 0;
p->task_netpolicy.ptr = (void *)p;
if (is_net_policy_valid(p->task_netpolicy.policy))
netpolicy_register(&p->task_netpolicy, p->task_netpolicy.policy);
diff --git a/net/core/netpolicy.c b/net/core/netpolicy.c
index 9e14137..a63ccd4 100644
--- a/net/core/netpolicy.c
+++ b/net/core/netpolicy.c
@@ -82,6 +82,10 @@ struct netpolicy_record {
static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(np_record_hash, 10);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(np_hashtable_lock);
+int netpolicy_sys_map_version;
+/* read write lock to protect sys map version */
+static DEFINE_RWLOCK(np_sys_map_lock);
+
static int netpolicy_get_dev_info(struct net_device *dev,
struct netpolicy_dev_info *d_info)
{
@@ -394,6 +398,24 @@ int netpolicy_pick_queue(struct netpolicy_reg *reg, bool is_rx)
(current->task_netpolicy.policy != reg->policy))
return -EINVAL;
+ /* fast path */
+ read_lock(&np_sys_map_lock);
+ if (netpolicy_sys_map_version == reg->sys_map_version) {
+ if (is_rx && (reg->rx_queue != ~0)) {
+ read_unlock(&np_sys_map_lock);
+ return reg->rx_queue;
+ }
+ if (!is_rx && (reg->tx_queue != ~0)) {
+ read_unlock(&np_sys_map_lock);
+ return reg->tx_queue;
+ }
+ } else {
+ reg->rx_queue = ~0;
+ reg->tx_queue = ~0;
+ reg->sys_map_version = netpolicy_sys_map_version;
+ }
+ read_unlock(&np_sys_map_lock);
+
old_record = netpolicy_record_search(ptr_id);
if (!old_record) {
pr_warn("NETPOLICY: doesn't registered. Remove net policy settings!\n");
@@ -435,6 +457,11 @@ int netpolicy_pick_queue(struct netpolicy_reg *reg, bool is_rx)
spin_unlock_bh(&np_hashtable_lock);
kfree(old_record);
+ if (is_rx)
+ reg->rx_queue = queue;
+ else
+ reg->tx_queue = queue;
+
return queue;
err:
@@ -522,6 +549,9 @@ void netpolicy_unregister(struct netpolicy_reg *reg)
rtnl_unlock();
reg->location = ~0;
reg->rule_queue = ~0;
+ reg->rx_queue = ~0;
+ reg->tx_queue = ~0;
+ reg->sys_map_version = 0;
}
spin_lock_bh(&np_hashtable_lock);
@@ -1272,6 +1302,10 @@ void update_netpolicy_sys_map(void)
netpolicy_disable(dev);
goto unlock;
}
+ write_lock(&np_sys_map_lock);
+ if (netpolicy_sys_map_version++ < 0)
+ netpolicy_sys_map_version = 0;
+ write_unlock(&np_sys_map_lock);
dev->netpolicy->cur_policy = cur_policy;
unlock:
@@ -1305,6 +1339,8 @@ static int __init netpolicy_init(void)
{
int ret;
+ netpolicy_sys_map_version = 0;
+
ret = register_pernet_subsys(&netpolicy_net_ops);
if (!ret)
register_netdevice_notifier(&netpolicy_dev_notf);
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 4d47a89..284aafd 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1447,6 +1447,9 @@ struct sock *sk_alloc(struct net *net, int family, gfp_t priority,
sk->sk_netpolicy.policy = NET_POLICY_INVALID;
sk->sk_netpolicy.location = ~0;
sk->sk_netpolicy.rule_queue = ~0;
+ sk->sk_netpolicy.rx_queue = ~0;
+ sk->sk_netpolicy.tx_queue = ~0;
+ sk->sk_netpolicy.sys_map_version = 0;
#endif
}
@@ -1630,6 +1633,9 @@ struct sock *sk_clone_lock(const struct sock *sk, const gfp_t priority)
newsk->sk_netpolicy.ptr = (void *)newsk;
newsk->sk_netpolicy.location = ~0;
newsk->sk_netpolicy.rule_queue = ~0;
+ newsk->sk_netpolicy.rx_queue = ~0;
+ newsk->sk_netpolicy.tx_queue = ~0;
+ newsk->sk_netpolicy.sys_map_version = 0;
if (is_net_policy_valid(current->task_netpolicy.policy))
newsk->sk_netpolicy.policy = NET_POLICY_INVALID;
if (is_net_policy_valid(newsk->sk_netpolicy.policy))
--
2.5.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-18 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-18 6:55 [RFC PATCH 00/30] Kernel NET policy kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 01/30] net: introduce " kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 02/30] net/netpolicy: init " kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 03/30] i40e/netpolicy: Implement ndo_netpolicy_init kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 04/30] net/netpolicy: get driver information kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 05/30] i40e/netpolicy: implement ndo_get_irq_info kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 06/30] net/netpolicy: get CPU information kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 07/30] net/netpolicy: create CPU and queue mapping kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 08/30] net/netpolicy: set and remove irq affinity kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 09/30] net/netpolicy: enable and disable net policy kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 10/30] net/netpolicy: introduce netpolicy object kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 11/30] net/netpolicy: set net policy by policy name kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 12/30] i40e/netpolicy: implement ndo_set_net_policy kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 13/30] i40e/netpolicy: add three new net policies kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 14/30] net/netpolicy: add MIX policy kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 15/30] i40e/netpolicy: add MIX policy support kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 16/30] net/netpolicy: net device hotplug kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 17/30] net/netpolicy: support CPU hotplug kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 18/30] net/netpolicy: handle channel changes kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 19/30] net/netpolicy: implement netpolicy register kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 20/30] net/netpolicy: introduce per socket netpolicy kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 21/30] net/policy: introduce netpolicy_pick_queue kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 22/30] net/netpolicy: set tx queues according to policy kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 23/30] i40e/ethtool: support RX_CLS_LOC_ANY kan.liang
2016-07-18 16:21 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 24/30] net/netpolicy: set rx queues according to policy kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 25/30] net/netpolicy: introduce per task net policy kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 26/30] net/netpolicy: set per task policy by proc kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` kan.liang [this message]
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 28/30] net/netpolicy: optimize for queue pair kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 29/30] net/netpolicy: limit the total record number kan.liang
2016-07-18 6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 30/30] Documentation/networking: Document net policy kan.liang
2016-07-18 16:58 ` Randy Dunlap
2016-07-18 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 00/30] Kernel NET policy Florian Westphal
2016-07-18 15:45 ` Andi Kleen
2016-07-18 17:52 ` Cong Wang
2016-07-18 20:14 ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 20:19 ` Cong Wang
2016-07-18 20:24 ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 19:04 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-07-18 19:43 ` Andi Kleen
2016-07-18 21:51 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-07-19 1:49 ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-19 5:03 ` David Miller
2016-07-19 13:43 ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 15:51 ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 16:17 ` Florian Westphal
2016-07-18 17:40 ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 16:34 ` Tom Herbert
2016-07-18 17:58 ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 16:22 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-07-18 18:30 ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 20:51 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-07-18 17:00 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-07-18 19:45 ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 19:49 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1468824984-65318-28-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=aduyck@mirantis.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=decot@googlers.com \
--cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®