mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kan.liang@intel.com
To: davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org,
	yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, gorcunov@openvz.org,
	john.stultz@linaro.org, aduyck@mirantis.com, ben@decadent.org.uk,
	decot@googlers.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
	andi@firstfloor.org, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 27/30] net/netpolicy: fast path for finding the queues
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 23:56:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1468824984-65318-28-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1468824984-65318-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>

Current implementation searches the hash table to get assigned object
for each transmit/receive packet. It's not necessory, because the
assigned object usually remain unchanged.

This patch store the assigned queue into netpolicy_reg struct. So it
doesnot need to search the hash table everytime unless the system cpu
and queue mapping changed.

netpolicy_sys_map_version is used to track the system cpu and queue
mapping changes. It's protected by a rw lock (TODO: will replace by RCU
shortly).

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
---
 include/linux/init_task.h |  3 +++
 include/linux/netpolicy.h |  5 +++++
 kernel/fork.c             |  3 +++
 net/core/netpolicy.c      | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 net/core/sock.c           |  6 ++++++
 5 files changed, 53 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/init_task.h b/include/linux/init_task.h
index eda7ffc..06ea231 100644
--- a/include/linux/init_task.h
+++ b/include/linux/init_task.h
@@ -189,6 +189,9 @@ extern struct task_group root_task_group;
 	.task_netpolicy.dev = NULL,					\
 	.task_netpolicy.location = ~0,					\
 	.task_netpolicy.rule_queue = ~0,				\
+	.task_netpolicy.rx_queue = ~0,					\
+	.task_netpolicy.tx_queue = ~0,					\
+	.task_netpolicy.sys_map_version = 0,				\
 	.task_netpolicy.ptr = (void *)&tsk,
 #else
 #define INIT_NETPOLICY(tsk)
diff --git a/include/linux/netpolicy.h b/include/linux/netpolicy.h
index 1cd5ac4..fa740b5 100644
--- a/include/linux/netpolicy.h
+++ b/include/linux/netpolicy.h
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ enum netpolicy_traffic {
 
 #define POLICY_NAME_LEN_MAX	64
 extern const char *policy_name[];
+extern int netpolicy_sys_map_version __read_mostly;
 
 struct netpolicy_dev_info {
 	u32	rx_num;
@@ -86,6 +87,10 @@ struct netpolicy_reg {
 	void			*ptr;		/* pointers */
 	u32			location;	/* rule location */
 	u32			rule_queue;	/* queue set by rule */
+	/* Info for fast path */
+	u32			rx_queue;
+	u32			tx_queue;
+	int			sys_map_version;
 };
 
 struct netpolicy_tcpudpip4_spec {
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 31262d2..fcb856b 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1456,6 +1456,9 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
 #ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLICY
 	p->task_netpolicy.location = ~0;
 	p->task_netpolicy.rule_queue = ~0;
+	p->task_netpolicy.rx_queue = ~0;
+	p->task_netpolicy.tx_queue = ~0;
+	p->task_netpolicy.sys_map_version = 0;
 	p->task_netpolicy.ptr = (void *)p;
 	if (is_net_policy_valid(p->task_netpolicy.policy))
 		netpolicy_register(&p->task_netpolicy, p->task_netpolicy.policy);
diff --git a/net/core/netpolicy.c b/net/core/netpolicy.c
index 9e14137..a63ccd4 100644
--- a/net/core/netpolicy.c
+++ b/net/core/netpolicy.c
@@ -82,6 +82,10 @@ struct netpolicy_record {
 static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(np_record_hash, 10);
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(np_hashtable_lock);
 
+int netpolicy_sys_map_version;
+/* read write lock to protect sys map version */
+static DEFINE_RWLOCK(np_sys_map_lock);
+
 static int netpolicy_get_dev_info(struct net_device *dev,
 				  struct netpolicy_dev_info *d_info)
 {
@@ -394,6 +398,24 @@ int netpolicy_pick_queue(struct netpolicy_reg *reg, bool is_rx)
 	    (current->task_netpolicy.policy != reg->policy))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* fast path */
+	read_lock(&np_sys_map_lock);
+	if (netpolicy_sys_map_version == reg->sys_map_version) {
+		if (is_rx && (reg->rx_queue != ~0)) {
+			read_unlock(&np_sys_map_lock);
+			return reg->rx_queue;
+		}
+		if (!is_rx && (reg->tx_queue != ~0)) {
+			read_unlock(&np_sys_map_lock);
+			return reg->tx_queue;
+		}
+	} else {
+		reg->rx_queue = ~0;
+		reg->tx_queue = ~0;
+		reg->sys_map_version = netpolicy_sys_map_version;
+	}
+	read_unlock(&np_sys_map_lock);
+
 	old_record = netpolicy_record_search(ptr_id);
 	if (!old_record) {
 		pr_warn("NETPOLICY: doesn't registered. Remove net policy settings!\n");
@@ -435,6 +457,11 @@ int netpolicy_pick_queue(struct netpolicy_reg *reg, bool is_rx)
 	spin_unlock_bh(&np_hashtable_lock);
 	kfree(old_record);
 
+	if (is_rx)
+		reg->rx_queue  = queue;
+	else
+		reg->tx_queue  = queue;
+
 	return queue;
 
 err:
@@ -522,6 +549,9 @@ void netpolicy_unregister(struct netpolicy_reg *reg)
 		rtnl_unlock();
 		reg->location = ~0;
 		reg->rule_queue = ~0;
+		reg->rx_queue = ~0;
+		reg->tx_queue = ~0;
+		reg->sys_map_version = 0;
 	}
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&np_hashtable_lock);
@@ -1272,6 +1302,10 @@ void update_netpolicy_sys_map(void)
 				netpolicy_disable(dev);
 				goto unlock;
 			}
+			write_lock(&np_sys_map_lock);
+			if (netpolicy_sys_map_version++ < 0)
+				netpolicy_sys_map_version = 0;
+			write_unlock(&np_sys_map_lock);
 
 			dev->netpolicy->cur_policy = cur_policy;
 unlock:
@@ -1305,6 +1339,8 @@ static int __init netpolicy_init(void)
 {
 	int ret;
 
+	netpolicy_sys_map_version = 0;
+
 	ret = register_pernet_subsys(&netpolicy_net_ops);
 	if (!ret)
 		register_netdevice_notifier(&netpolicy_dev_notf);
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 4d47a89..284aafd 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1447,6 +1447,9 @@ struct sock *sk_alloc(struct net *net, int family, gfp_t priority,
 		sk->sk_netpolicy.policy = NET_POLICY_INVALID;
 		sk->sk_netpolicy.location = ~0;
 		sk->sk_netpolicy.rule_queue = ~0;
+		sk->sk_netpolicy.rx_queue = ~0;
+		sk->sk_netpolicy.tx_queue = ~0;
+		sk->sk_netpolicy.sys_map_version = 0;
 #endif
 	}
 
@@ -1630,6 +1633,9 @@ struct sock *sk_clone_lock(const struct sock *sk, const gfp_t priority)
 		newsk->sk_netpolicy.ptr = (void *)newsk;
 		newsk->sk_netpolicy.location = ~0;
 		newsk->sk_netpolicy.rule_queue = ~0;
+		newsk->sk_netpolicy.rx_queue = ~0;
+		newsk->sk_netpolicy.tx_queue = ~0;
+		newsk->sk_netpolicy.sys_map_version = 0;
 		if (is_net_policy_valid(current->task_netpolicy.policy))
 			newsk->sk_netpolicy.policy = NET_POLICY_INVALID;
 		if (is_net_policy_valid(newsk->sk_netpolicy.policy))
-- 
2.5.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-07-18 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-18  6:55 [RFC PATCH 00/30] Kernel NET policy kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 01/30] net: introduce " kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 02/30] net/netpolicy: init " kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 03/30] i40e/netpolicy: Implement ndo_netpolicy_init kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 04/30] net/netpolicy: get driver information kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 05/30] i40e/netpolicy: implement ndo_get_irq_info kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 06/30] net/netpolicy: get CPU information kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 07/30] net/netpolicy: create CPU and queue mapping kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 08/30] net/netpolicy: set and remove irq affinity kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 09/30] net/netpolicy: enable and disable net policy kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 10/30] net/netpolicy: introduce netpolicy object kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 11/30] net/netpolicy: set net policy by policy name kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 12/30] i40e/netpolicy: implement ndo_set_net_policy kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 13/30] i40e/netpolicy: add three new net policies kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 14/30] net/netpolicy: add MIX policy kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 15/30] i40e/netpolicy: add MIX policy support kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 16/30] net/netpolicy: net device hotplug kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 17/30] net/netpolicy: support CPU hotplug kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 18/30] net/netpolicy: handle channel changes kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 19/30] net/netpolicy: implement netpolicy register kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 20/30] net/netpolicy: introduce per socket netpolicy kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 21/30] net/policy: introduce netpolicy_pick_queue kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 22/30] net/netpolicy: set tx queues according to policy kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 23/30] i40e/ethtool: support RX_CLS_LOC_ANY kan.liang
2016-07-18 16:21   ` Alexander Duyck
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 24/30] net/netpolicy: set rx queues according to policy kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 25/30] net/netpolicy: introduce per task net policy kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 26/30] net/netpolicy: set per task policy by proc kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` kan.liang [this message]
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 28/30] net/netpolicy: optimize for queue pair kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 29/30] net/netpolicy: limit the total record number kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 30/30] Documentation/networking: Document net policy kan.liang
2016-07-18 16:58   ` Randy Dunlap
2016-07-18 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 00/30] Kernel NET policy Florian Westphal
2016-07-18 15:45   ` Andi Kleen
2016-07-18 17:52     ` Cong Wang
2016-07-18 20:14       ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 20:19         ` Cong Wang
2016-07-18 20:24           ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 19:04     ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-07-18 19:43       ` Andi Kleen
2016-07-18 21:51         ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-07-19  1:49           ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-19  5:03             ` David Miller
2016-07-19 13:43               ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 15:51   ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 16:17     ` Florian Westphal
2016-07-18 17:40       ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 16:34     ` Tom Herbert
2016-07-18 17:58       ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 16:22 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-07-18 18:30   ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 20:51     ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-07-18 17:00 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-07-18 19:45   ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 19:49     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1468824984-65318-28-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=aduyck@mirantis.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=decot@googlers.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®