From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755089AbcGTScB (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:32:01 -0400 Received: from host.buserror.net ([209.198.135.123]:34111 "EHLO host.buserror.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751375AbcGTSb4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:31:56 -0400 Message-ID: <1469039508.25630.17.camel@buserror.net> From: Scott Wood To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Yangbo Lu , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:31:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4016699.uYaV8nWfqC@wuerfel> References: <1468723822-30457-1-git-send-email-oss@buserror.net> <1468723822-30457-5-git-send-email-oss@buserror.net> <4016699.uYaV8nWfqC@wuerfel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 75.72.173.242 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: oss@buserror.net X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * -15 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] powerpc/fsl: move mpc85xx.h to include/linux/fsl X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on host.buserror.net) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 13:24 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday, July 16, 2016 9:50:21 PM CEST Scott Wood wrote: > > > > From: yangbo lu > > > > Move mpc85xx.h to include/linux/fsl and rename it to svr.h as a common > > header file.  This SVR numberspace is used on some ARM chips as well as > > PPC, and even to check for a PPC SVR multi-arch drivers would otherwise > > need to ifdef the header inclusion and all references to the SVR symbols. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu > > Acked-by: Wolfram Sang > > Acked-by: Stephen Boyd > > Acked-by: Joerg Roedel > > [scottwood: update description] > > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood > > > As discussed before, please don't introduce yet another vendor specific > way to match a SoC ID from a device driver. > > I've posted a patch for an extension to the soc_device infrastructure > to allow comparing the running SoC to a table of devices, use that > instead. As I asked before, in which relevant maintainership capacity are you NACKing this? -Scott