From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S316735AbSERBjc>; Fri, 17 May 2002 21:39:32 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S316737AbSERBjb>; Fri, 17 May 2002 21:39:31 -0400
Received: from mail.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.2]:10513 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S316735AbSERBjb>;
	Fri, 17 May 2002 21:39:31 -0400
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4
From: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 17 May 2002 11:42:26 -0400."
             <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205171137440.4117-100000@xanadu.home> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 11:39:19 +1000
Message-ID: <14700.1021685959@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 17 May 2002 11:42:26 -0400 (EDT), 
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> wrote:
>Keith gets ignored.  He receives suggestions for alternative ways which he 
>ignores too.  I therefore intend to ignore his work as well.

I ignore stupid comments, yours falls into that category.  I have good
reason for asking for Linus's OPINION before sending the patch.  Note I
am not asking Linus to take the patch right now, I am asking for some
guidance.  Unless you have something useful to contribute, I will
continue to ignore you.