mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>, Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix lock pinning warning during cpu hotplug
Date: Thu,  4 Aug 2016 09:42:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470274940-17976-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> (raw)

From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3531 lock_release+0x690/0x6a0
releasing a pinned lock
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x99/0xd0
 __warn+0xd1/0xf0
 ? dl_task_timer+0x1a1/0x2b0
 warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4f/0x60
 ? sched_clock+0x13/0x20
 lock_release+0x690/0x6a0
 ? enqueue_pushable_dl_task+0x9b/0xa0
 ? enqueue_task_dl+0x1ca/0x480
 _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40
 dl_task_timer+0x1a1/0x2b0
 ? push_dl_task.part.31+0x190/0x190
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3649 lock_unpin_lock+0x181/0x1a0
unpinning an unpinned lock
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x99/0xd0
 __warn+0xd1/0xf0
 warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4f/0x60
 lock_unpin_lock+0x181/0x1a0
 dl_task_timer+0x127/0x2b0
 ? push_dl_task.part.31+0x190/0x190

This can be triggered by hot-unplug the cpu which dl task is running on.

DL task will be migrated to a most suitable later deadline rq or fallback 
to any eligible online CPU after dl timer fires if current rq is offline. 
We need to hold rq lock of both rqs to confirm there is nothing changed 
and compare the task deadline and the earliest_dl deadline of the destination 
cpu in the progress of finding suitable destination cpu.

The rq lock of offline cpu will be unlocked in _double_lock_balance and then 
reacquire both rq locks in a fair way, the rq lock of offline cpu is held and 
lockdep pin before, however, it will be unlocked in _double_lock_balance directly 
w/o lockdep unpin, which triggers the "releasing a pinned lock" warning above.

Queue the task to the destination cpu might have overloaded rq, so the current 
implementation will check if we need to kick some away, rq lock will be lockdep 
unpin since push_dl_task() will release the rq lock and reacquire it. However, 
if there is cpu hot-unplug and dl task migration, the rq lock is lockdep unpin, 
so it will trigger the "unpinning an unpinned lock" above.

This patch fix it by lockdep unpin the offline cpu before task migration during 
cpu hotplug handling and lockdep pin destination cpu after this handling since 
the rq lock is held during this handling.

Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index fcb7f02..1ce8867 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -658,8 +658,11 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
 	 *
 	 * XXX figure out if select_task_rq_dl() deals with offline cpus.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(!rq->online))
+	if (unlikely(!rq->online)) {
+		lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, rf.cookie);
 		rq = dl_task_offline_migration(rq, p);
+		rf.cookie = lockdep_pin_lock(&rq->lock);
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Queueing this task back might have overloaded rq, check if we need
-- 
1.9.1

             reply	other threads:[~2016-08-04  1:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-04  1:42 Wanpeng Li [this message]
2016-08-10 18:01 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Fix lock pinning warning during CPU hotplug tip-bot for Wanpeng Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1470274940-17976-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
    --to=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®