From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932193AbcHKTbD (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2016 15:31:03 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:32841 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751975AbcHKTbA (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2016 15:31:00 -0400 From: Kirill Marinushkin To: joe@perches.com Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, k.marinushkin@gmil.com, zer0mem@yahoo.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, serge@hallyn.com, james.l.morris@oracle.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Kirill Marinushkin Subject: RE: [PATCH] KEYS: Sort out big_key initialisation Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 21:17:33 +0200 Message-Id: <1470943053-8619-1-git-send-email-k.marinushkin@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1469909550.3998.123.camel@perches.com> References: <1469909550.3998.123.camel@perches.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It's much more common to use > > #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt This happened to be a wrong email thread and a wrong kernel tag; I resent a proper patch in-reply-to a proper thread.