From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Subject: [PATCH] fs/pipe: fix shift by 64 in F_SETPIPE_SZ
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 14:35:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471005340-13682-1-git-send-email-vegard.nossum@oracle.com> (raw)
I got this:
================================================================================
UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in ./include/linux/log2.h:63:13
shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'
CPU: 0 PID: 5351 Comm: trinity-c0 Not tainted 4.8.0-rc1+ #84
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.9.3-0-ge2fc41e-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
0000000000000000 ffff880115c67c08 ffffffff82344f40 0000000041b58ab3
ffffffff84f98000 ffffffff82344e94 ffff880115c67c30 ffff880115c67be0
0000000000000001 ffff880115c679e8 dffffc0000000000 ffffffff85bf0820
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff82344f40>] dump_stack+0xac/0xfc
[<ffffffff8242f5a8>] ubsan_epilogue+0xd/0x8a
[<ffffffff82430c31>] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x255/0x29a
[<ffffffff818229ab>] pipe_fcntl+0x59b/0x800
[<ffffffff8184504a>] SyS_fcntl+0x69a/0xe50
[<ffffffff81007bd3>] do_syscall_64+0x1b3/0x4b0
[<ffffffff845f946a>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
================================================================================
The problem is that if the argument (an unsigned long) passed to
F_SETPIPE_SZ is either 0 or greater than UINT_MAX, then
roundup_pow_of_two() will hit undefined behavior because the shift
width will be 64.
Even if we limited the argument to UINT_MAX, we would still need to
keep the !nr_pages check, as passing anything greater than INT_MAX
will give a nr_pages inside round_pipe_size() of (1 << 20) which
then gets truncated to 0 when we convert it to an unsigned int
(because (1 << 20) << PAGE_SHIFT == 1 << 32).
If we limit it to INT_MAX, then we know nr_pages will never be 0.
Rudimentary boundary analysis (both 32- and 64-bit):
arg == 0: gets rejected with -EINVAL by our check
arg == 1: round_pipe_size() rounds up to PAGE_SIZE and returns PAGE_SIZE
arg == INT_MAX - 1: round_pipe_size() returns 0x80000000
arg == INT_MAX: round_pipe_size() returns 0x80000000
arg > INT_MAX: gets rejected with -EINVAL by our check
In practice the undefined behaviour causes my gcc at least to return
0 for the large shift (i.e. 1ULL << 64 == 0), so nothing bad happens
because this is caught by the if (!nr_pages) check. But I don't think
we can bank on this always being the case. This patch avoids the
undefined behaviour completely. (Stable not on Cc since it violates
the “no "This could be a problem"” rule.)
Tested on 32- and 64-bit x86/UML.
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
---
fs/pipe.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
index 4ebe6b2..42ea89f 100644
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -1115,13 +1115,13 @@ long pipe_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
case F_SETPIPE_SZ: {
unsigned int size, nr_pages;
- size = round_pipe_size(arg);
- nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-
ret = -EINVAL;
- if (!nr_pages)
+ if (!arg || arg > INT_MAX)
goto out;
+ size = round_pipe_size(arg);
+ nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) && size > pipe_max_size) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto out;
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-08-12 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-12 12:35 Vegard Nossum [this message]
2016-08-15 8:06 ` Willy Tarreau
2016-08-15 8:22 ` Vegard Nossum
2016-08-15 8:34 ` Willy Tarreau
2016-08-15 8:55 ` Vegard Nossum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1471005340-13682-1-git-send-email-vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
--to=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®