From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932206AbcHOAhI (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:37:08 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:47018 "EHLO out2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751015AbcHOAhG (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:37:06 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: JrxLySawVQslw7wNzYfRDhxClW46XdEG8+CStlVzuqhd 1471221423 Message-ID: <1471221412.27272.76.camel@aj.id.au> Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] pinctrl: Add core pinctrl support for Aspeed SoCs From: Andrew Jeffery To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Linus Walleij Cc: Alexandre Courbot , Joel Stanley , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Russell King , Jeremy Kerr , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:06:52 +0930 In-Reply-To: <1471049894.12231.41.camel@kernel.crashing.org> References: <1468994313-13538-1-git-send-email-andrew@aj.id.au> <1468994313-13538-3-git-send-email-andrew@aj.id.au> <1470962022.27272.68.camel@aj.id.au> <1471049894.12231.41.camel@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Kkmm5pzJ9XyCVSXgcQ3s" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-Kkmm5pzJ9XyCVSXgcQ3s Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2016-08-13 at 10:58 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 15:18 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > >=20 > > I would probably prefer that option (introduce another field) > > but you should make the overall decision, it's no strong opinion > > from my side. > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Would it be acceptable to document that requirement? > It might make it a bit less nasty (and easier to change later on > if necessary) to use some kind of: >=20 > bool ast_signal_is_gpio(...) >=20 > And stick the strcmp in there. Yep, I'll do so for v2. Cheers, Andrew --=-Kkmm5pzJ9XyCVSXgcQ3s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCgAGBQJXsQ6kAAoJEJ0dnzgO5LT5aNgP/3haTd+82bDoeVfUYU6v9yNk FRY+AdbZDoZcD0szs62isNzp6OxmmUpzgKoP32WVZ1ly6YnUjqNFXGytiQYdjoeN qxexicf56ICRC+KIevpQPFOk72Jyifj2e0YWFDAc3OLrEfd9wan/1kfvr06cb9PE GL+TraBA9YWQ3yo7S0KirAYbY4uvaM63vJ7YcrxeoazU6l2A5wh+k+a1cXp7LXdD llfdnc+2/v8RAfon+nSm0MYBEa6AQJoUAEdE3z+9+k/VfLNzMpqTDFesvEMXfIAd UOLWXaYEg76wrH39gj2QDPCg112PgxjVGmbz4lRtrddzXU7/umtVbYWudNOOQtUV r28Lky6RlmQsZZ7we9hlbI8oqr8whJTmVXUVzADklzYLxdXSNYY8gFbZ7QyTti4y NNPvmHGhMVI5MtJ5zU+7kGc66qn4H3GIBfWjsRITPr14GCaz3DDi5Sq10Ui9PMki bU87q+3326woIH4IKZB+T4RyppmHRoRqvlDwVawukyIKgGP3f4uPbJ1H5YrMYNdV 1kb0Z3o+1+NRgSPIWJeVrHK0S9kCw+fBtjm79Q/emxvP4v45R5313UdRP+cqCkUT PcqUbXWzcOmBFdaHVADEpxVm7HhSdEkle7/5mBthdC8Vba2+PgmpXZwq6kK35SfW lhU5QWdrdkJ/W89kUV+k =5CeO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Kkmm5pzJ9XyCVSXgcQ3s--