From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Syed Rameez Mustafa <rameezmustafa@codeaurora.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] list: Split list_add() debug checking into separate function
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:42:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471470132-29499-2-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471470132-29499-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org>
Right now, __list_add() code is repeated either in list.h or in
list_debug.c, but only the debug checks are the different part. This
extracts the checking into a separate function and consolidates
__list_add(). Additionally this __list_add_debug() will stop list
manipulations if a corruption is detected, instead of allowing for further
corruption that may lead to even worse conditions.
This is slight refactoring of the same hardening done in PaX and Grsecurity.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
include/linux/list.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
lib/list_debug.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/list.h b/include/linux/list.h
index 5183138aa932..0ed58591538e 100644
--- a/include/linux/list.h
+++ b/include/linux/list.h
@@ -28,27 +28,37 @@ static inline void INIT_LIST_HEAD(struct list_head *list)
list->prev = list;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST
+extern bool __list_add_valid(struct list_head *new,
+ struct list_head *prev,
+ struct list_head *next);
+#else
+static inline bool __list_add_valid(struct list_head *new,
+ struct list_head *prev,
+ struct list_head *next)
+{
+ return true;
+}
+#endif
+
/*
* Insert a new entry between two known consecutive entries.
*
* This is only for internal list manipulation where we know
* the prev/next entries already!
*/
-#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST
static inline void __list_add(struct list_head *new,
struct list_head *prev,
struct list_head *next)
{
+ if (!__list_add_valid(new, prev, next))
+ return;
+
next->prev = new;
new->next = next;
new->prev = prev;
WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, new);
}
-#else
-extern void __list_add(struct list_head *new,
- struct list_head *prev,
- struct list_head *next);
-#endif
/**
* list_add - add a new entry
diff --git a/lib/list_debug.c b/lib/list_debug.c
index 3859bf63561c..149dd57b583b 100644
--- a/lib/list_debug.c
+++ b/lib/list_debug.c
@@ -2,8 +2,7 @@
* Copyright 2006, Red Hat, Inc., Dave Jones
* Released under the General Public License (GPL).
*
- * This file contains the linked list implementations for
- * DEBUG_LIST.
+ * This file contains the linked list validation for DEBUG_LIST.
*/
#include <linux/export.h>
@@ -13,33 +12,32 @@
#include <linux/rculist.h>
/*
- * Insert a new entry between two known consecutive entries.
- *
- * This is only for internal list manipulation where we know
- * the prev/next entries already!
+ * Check that the data structures for the list manipulations are reasonably
+ * valid. Failures here indicate memory corruption (and possibly an exploit
+ * attempt).
*/
-void __list_add(struct list_head *new,
- struct list_head *prev,
- struct list_head *next)
+bool __list_add_valid(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *prev,
+ struct list_head *next)
{
- WARN(next->prev != prev,
- "list_add corruption. next->prev should be "
- "prev (%p), but was %p. (next=%p).\n",
- prev, next->prev, next);
- WARN(prev->next != next,
- "list_add corruption. prev->next should be "
- "next (%p), but was %p. (prev=%p).\n",
- next, prev->next, prev);
- WARN(new == prev || new == next,
- "list_add double add: new=%p, prev=%p, next=%p.\n",
- new, prev, next);
- next->prev = new;
- new->next = next;
- new->prev = prev;
- WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, new);
+ if (unlikely(next->prev != prev)) {
+ WARN(1, "list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (%p), but was %p. (next=%p).\n",
+ prev, next->prev, next);
+ return false;
+ }
+ if (unlikely(prev->next != next)) {
+ WARN(1, "list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (%p), but was %p. (prev=%p).\n",
+ next, prev->next, prev);
+ return false;
+ }
+ if (unlikely(new == prev || new == next)) {
+ WARN(1, "list_add double add: new=%p, prev=%p, next=%p.\n",
+ new, prev, next);
+ return false;
+ }
+ return true;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_add);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_add_valid);
void __list_del_entry(struct list_head *entry)
{
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-17 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-17 21:42 [PATCH v3 0/5] bug: Provide toggle for BUG on data corruption Kees Cook
2016-08-17 21:42 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2016-08-17 21:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] rculist: Consolidate DEBUG_LIST for list_add_rcu() Kees Cook
2016-08-17 21:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] list: Split list_del() debug checking into separate function Kees Cook
2016-08-17 21:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] bug: Provide toggle for BUG on data corruption Kees Cook
2016-08-22 13:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-22 17:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-08-22 22:32 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2016-08-17 21:42 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] lkdtm: Add tests for struct list corruption Kees Cook
2016-08-18 13:46 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] bug: Provide toggle for BUG on data corruption Steven Rostedt
2016-08-18 17:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-08-18 17:42 ` [kernel-hardening] " Rik van Riel
2016-08-18 20:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-08-19 2:53 ` Rik van Riel
2016-08-19 17:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1471470132-29499-2-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=danielmicay@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rameezmustafa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®