mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Josh Max <JMax@mail.greenriver.edu>, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_misc: allow selecting the interpreter based on xattr keywords
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 12:15:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1472141735.3489.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471838494-29672-1-git-send-email-JMax@mail.greenriver.edu>

On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 21:01 -0700, Josh Max wrote:
> This patch allows binfmt_misc to select the interpeter for arbitrary
> binaries by comparing a specified registered keyword with the value
> of a specified binary's extended attribute (user.binfmt.interp),
> and then launching the program with the registered interpreter.
> 
> This is useful when wanting to launch a collection of binaries under
> the same interpreter, even when they do not necessarily share a 
> common extension or magic bits, or when their magic conflics with the
> operation of binfmt_elf. Some examples of its use would be to launch 
> some executables of various different architectures in a directory, 
> or for running some native binaries under a sandbox (like firejail) 
> automatically during their launch.

Could you expand on the use cases?  The patch set looks OK; the issue
with extended attributes is lack of universal support on filesystems,
but that may not be a problem because they're definitely supported on
all the standard ones.  I think the current F flag solves the foreign
binary in chroot or container.  Self sandboxing sounds reasonable, but
if this is a security feature, doesn't having the label under the user.
EAs mean that the confined binary can simply remove the label and
unconfine itself?

James

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-25 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-22  4:01 Josh Max
2016-08-25 16:15 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2016-08-26  8:00   ` Josh Max
2016-08-26 14:55   ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-26 17:59     ` Carlos O'Donell
2016-08-26 21:38       ` James Bottomley
2016-11-11 10:31       ` Alex Bennée
2016-08-26 21:12     ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-08-26 21:26       ` James Bottomley
2016-08-27 11:52         ` One Thousand Gnomes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1472141735.3489.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=JMax@mail.greenriver.edu \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome