[PATCH 1/5] ipc/sem.c: Remove smp_rmb() from complexmode_enter()

[Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>]

complexmode_enter() contains an smp_rmb() after spin_unlock_wait().
This was done to allow safe backporting.

With commit 2c6100227116
("locking/qspinlock: Fix spin_unlock_wait() some more"),
(and the commits for the other archs), spin_unlock_wait() is an
ACQUIRE.
Therefore the smp_rmb() after spin_unlock_wait() can be removed.

Not for stable!

Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
---
 ipc/sem.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index 5e318c5..6586e0a 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -290,14 +290,6 @@ static void complexmode_enter(struct sem_array *sma)
 		sem = sma->sem_base + i;
 		spin_unlock_wait(&sem->lock);
 	}
-	/*
-	 * spin_unlock_wait() is not a memory barriers, it is only a
-	 * control barrier. The code must pair with spin_unlock(&sem->lock),
-	 * thus just the control barrier is insufficient.
-	 *
-	 * smp_rmb() is sufficient, as writes cannot pass the control barrier.
-	 */
-	smp_rmb();
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.7.4