From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757793AbcILKRB (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2016 06:17:01 -0400 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.183]:24231 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757715AbcILKQ7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2016 06:16:59 -0400 Message-ID: <1473675413.12398.29.camel@mtksdaap41> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701 From: YT Shen To: CK Hu CC: , Philipp Zabel , David Airlie , Matthias Brugger , Daniel Kurtz , Mao Huang , Bibby Hsieh , "Daniel Vetter" , Thierry Reding , Jie Qiu , Maxime Ripard , Chris Wilson , shaoming chen , Jitao Shi , Boris Brezillon , Dan Carpenter , , , , , Sascha Hauer , , Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 18:16:53 +0800 In-Reply-To: <1473226653.11736.33.camel@mtksdaap41> References: <1472815484-43821-1-git-send-email-yt.shen@mediatek.com> <1472815484-43821-10-git-send-email-yt.shen@mediatek.com> <1473226653.11736.33.camel@mtksdaap41> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi CK, On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 13:37 +0800, CK Hu wrote: > Hi, YT: > > On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 19:24 +0800, YT Shen wrote: > > This patch add support for the Mediatek MT2701 DISP subsystem. > > There is only one OVL engine in MT2701. > > > > Signed-off-by: YT Shen > > [snip...] > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c > > index 4b4e449..465819b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c > > @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ struct mtk_ddp_comp_match { > > > > static const struct mtk_ddp_comp_match mtk_ddp_matches[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = { > > [DDP_COMPONENT_AAL] = { MTK_DISP_AAL, 0, NULL }, > > + [DDP_COMPONENT_BLS] = { MTK_DISP_PWM, 0, NULL }, > > I think BLS is different than PWM, so this statement should be > > [DDP_COMPONENT_BLS] = { MTK_DISP_BLS, 0, NULL }; The BLS module actually is a multifunction device, one of them is the PWM function. We only upstream PWM function [1] now, and it is accepted. When there are real use case (gamma function), we will update this part. What do you think? Regards, yt.shen [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9223001/ > > > > [DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0] = { MTK_DISP_COLOR, 0, &ddp_color }, > > [DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR1] = { MTK_DISP_COLOR, 1, &ddp_color }, > > [DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0] = { MTK_DPI, 0, NULL }, > > Regards, > CK > >