From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] thread_info: use unsigned long for flags
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:24:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1474651447-30447-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
The generic THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK definition of thread_info::flags is a
u32, matching x86 prior to the introduction of THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK.
However, common helpers like test_ti_thread_flag() implicitly assume
that thread_info::flags has at least the size and alignment of unsigned
long, and relying on padding and alignment provided by other elements of
task_struct is somewhat fragile. Additionally, some architectures use
more that 32 bits for thread_info::flags, and others may need to in
future.
With THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK, task struct follows thread_info with a long
field, and thus we no longer save any space as we did back in commit
affa219b60a11b32 ("x86: change thread_info's flag field back to 32
bits").
Given all this, it makes more sense for the generic thread_info::flags
to be an unsigned long. Make it so.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
include/linux/thread_info.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
As discussed in the arm64 RFC.
Andy, I'm assuming that as with affa219b60a11b32 no x86 assembly fixups are
required. An x86_64 defconfig built fine for me.
I've based this on your x86/vmap_stack branch. I'm not sure what the plan is
for merging that. If I should be using a different branch to base the arm64
work atop of, please let me know!
Thanks,
Mark.
diff --git a/include/linux/thread_info.h b/include/linux/thread_info.h
index f3837c7..a2c2f88 100644
--- a/include/linux/thread_info.h
+++ b/include/linux/thread_info.h
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK
struct thread_info {
- u32 flags; /* low level flags */
+ unsigned long flags; /* low level flags */
};
#define INIT_THREAD_INFO(tsk) \
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-09-23 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-23 17:24 Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-09-23 18:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-23 23:48 ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-24 16:28 ` [tip:x86/asm] thread_info: Use " tip-bot for Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1474651447-30447-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®