mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/x86: Remove second call to topology_update_package_map()
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:51:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476301900.4440.6.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57FE5171.3030305@redhat.com>

On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 11:06 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> 
> On 10/12/2016 10:36 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > 
> > This was noticed during the investigation of
> > 
> > http://git.kernel.org/tip/2a51fe083eba7f99cbda72f5ef90cdf2f4df882c
> > 
> > A note for reviewers on the cleanup in smp_init_package_map(): The
> > per_cpu variable x86_bios_cpu_apicid is initialized to BAD_APICID, and the
> > bitmaps are set to false by default so the code isn't necessary.  The
> > pr_warn() can also be dropped as generic_processor_info() will do a
> > pr_warning() in the same situation.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > P.
> > 
> > -----8<-----
> > 
> > After commit 1f12e32f4cd5 ("x86/topology: Create logical package id"),
> > topology_update_package_map() is called twice on a CPU.  The first call is in
> > generic_processor_info(), which is called on all present cpus (found in either
> > mptable or ACPI MADT).  The second call is in smp_init_package_map() which
> > is called later on in the init sequence.
> > 
> > Only a single call is necessary for the kernel to initialize the data
> > structures properly. This patch drops the later call in smp_init_package_map()
> > and moves smp_init_package_map() out of smp_store_boot_cpu_info().
> > 
> Self-NAK.
> 
> This seems to not work on systems with an empty socket :/.  Looking into this now.
> 
> P.

My single node workstation also failed to boot with the patch.

Tim

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-12 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-12 14:36 Prarit Bhargava
2016-10-12 15:06 ` Prarit Bhargava
2016-10-12 19:51   ` Tim Chen [this message]
2016-10-12 20:54     ` Prarit Bhargava
2016-10-12 22:06       ` Tim Chen
2016-10-12 22:37         ` Prarit Bhargava

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1476301900.4440.6.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome