From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752937AbcJMOs7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:48:59 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:59200 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752745AbcJMOsv (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:48:51 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,340,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="1064351257" From: "Luc, Piotr" To: "rjw@rjwysocki.net" CC: "srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "viresh.kumar@linaro.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "lenb@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add Knights Mill CPUID Thread-Topic: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add Knights Mill CPUID Thread-Index: AQHSJL9mUFNdTQgugUy598/OUPOXqKCmZkyA Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:48:28 +0000 Message-ID: <1476369859.27971.11.camel@intel.com> References: <20161012182550.2102-1-piotr.luc@intel.com> <1991911.AIWBrncZ9n@vostro.rjw.lan> In-Reply-To: <1991911.AIWBrncZ9n@vostro.rjw.lan> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.237.138.164] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <29199195E6B0594698F27DA5BB4A9657@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id u9DEn21P018861 On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 21:39 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 08:25:50 PM Piotr Luc wrote: > > > > --- > > Depends-on: x86/cpu/intel: Add Knights Mill to Intel family > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161012180520.30976-1-piotr.luc () intel > > ! com > > First, putting broken URLs into patch tags doesn't really help. OK, with a series the link is not needed. I will refer to a patch inside the series. > > Second, please send all of these patches as a series where the first > patch makes the change the rest depends on.  That would make them > easier to > handle. > I see. I just wonder if I should send the entire series to all maintainers that maintain individual modules/files or somehow limit 'TO' recipients only to their modules.  Is any good method to it correctly? Thanks, Piotr