From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936060AbcJXI4x (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 04:56:53 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.4.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:44840 "EHLO metis.ext.4.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934500AbcJXI4v (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 04:56:51 -0400 Message-ID: <1477299405.2446.9.camel@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] reset: make non-modular drivers really non modular From: Philipp Zabel To: Paul Gortmaker Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Antoine Tenart , Joachim Eastwood , Masahiro Yamada , Maxime Ripard , Michal Simek , Moritz Fischer , Sebastian Hesselbarth , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F6ren?= Brinkmann , Steffen Trumtrar Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:56:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20161022214857.GO3147@windriver.com> References: <20160613180338.29199-1-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20161022214857.GO3147@windriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:96de:80ff:fec2:9969 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Paul, Am Samstag, den 22.10.2016, 17:48 -0400 schrieb Paul Gortmaker: > [[PATCH 0/5] reset: make non-modular drivers really non modular] On 13/06/2016 (Mon 14:03) Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > > For anyone new to the underlying goal of this cleanup, we are trying to > > not use module support for code that can never be built as a module since: > > Hi Philipp, > > I sent this several months ago, and aside from a couple Ack'd by, there > was no negative feedback or similar. > > Since then there have been two more drivers added with the same issue. > > reset-make-ath79-explicitly-non-modular.patch > reset-pistachio-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch > > Should I assume that the original send has fallen through the cracks and > resend with the two new patches, or do you still have the original five > in a queue somewhere? thanks for the reminder. I had them stashed away because I wanted to see whether the introduction of per-driver Kconfig options would change some of them to become modular. That wasn't the case, so I have pushed your patches to the reset/next branch now, with fixed up commit messages. > I'd like to merge as many of these as I can via their respective > maintainers vs. trying to send them to Linus directly. > > Thanks, > Paul. regards Philipp