From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966706AbcKLR0D (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:26:03 -0500 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:35486 "EHLO relay5-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966401AbcKLR0C (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:26:02 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 83.155.44.161 Message-ID: <1478971557.2497.17.camel@hadess.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] HID: udraw: Add support for the uDraw tablet for PS3 From: Bastien Nocera To: Jiri Kosina Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 18:25:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1478611807.2497.2.camel@hadess.net> References: <1478274223-3633-1-git-send-email-hadess@hadess.net> <1478611807.2497.2.camel@hadess.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.1 (3.22.1-2.fc25) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 14:30 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 14:23 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > > > Hi Bastien, > > > > overall the driver looks ok to me, thanks. Probably the only > > concern > > I'd  > > have -- traditionally, we've always been naming drivers by the > > vendor, as  > > it turned out that over time they get extended by adding support > > for  > > multiple devices with the same vendor, and usually there is quite > > some  > > overlap in shared code. > > In that particular case, I'd rather it got renamed to "hid-udraw-ps3" > in this case. The XBox 360 and Wii versions use completely different > protocols: > http://brandonw.net/udraw/ > > The XBox 360 version is more likely to be integrated in with other > XBox > pads, and the Wii version along with other Wii Bluetooth remotes. > > > Hence I'd propose to call this driver hid-thq (if that's really > > the  > > vendor's proper name, doesn't seem to be present in latest usb.ids  > > release). > > THQ went under in 2012, as a result of making too many of those > drawing > tablets: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/THQ > > I'm fine with it either way. Just let me know which one you prefer. So, any preference? The sooner you make that choice, the sooner I can send an updated patch and push this into my distribution's kernel. I have a machine waiting on the hardware driver for control :) Cheers