From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754075AbcKPUPM (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:15:12 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f68.google.com ([74.125.83.68]:35696 "EHLO mail-pg0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752546AbcKPUPL (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:15:11 -0500 Message-ID: <1479327308.8455.215.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Subject: Re: [BUG] X86: Removing inline decl on arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h. From: Eric Dumazet To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Realtek linux nic maintainers , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:15:08 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1479239164-7721-1-git-send-email-asd@marian1000.go.ro> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 20:16 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, Corcodel Marian wrote: > > Inline declarations suppress warning message from compiler but > > most of these functions was declared static and is not used local on file. > > Huch? This is a header file and the functions are marked inline on purpose. > > Can you please explain what you are trying to achieve and why you think > that this is a good idea? Corcodel Marian is a bot. Do not bother Thomas. Total Waste of time. https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg370788.html https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg103775.html