From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
dave.martin@arm.com, aph@redhat.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
ryan.arnold@linaro.org, sid@reserved-bit.com,
adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
marc.zyngier@arm.com, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] arm64: cpufeature: Cleanup feature bit tables
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 13:40:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1479994809-9081-4-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479994809-9081-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
This patch does the following clean ups :
1) All undescribed fields of a register are now treated as "strict"
with a safe value of 0. Hence we could leave an empty table for
describing registers which are RAZ.
2) ID_AA64DFR1_EL1 is RAZ and should use the table for RAZ register.
3) ftr_generic32 is used to represent a register with a 32bit feature
value. Rename this to ftr_singl32 to make it more obvious. Since
we don't have a 64bit singe feature register, kill ftr_generic.
Based on a patch by Mark Rutland.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 19 +++++++------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index aaf3cba..67e6935 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -246,18 +246,13 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_generic_32bits[] = {
ARM64_FTR_END,
};
-static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_generic[] = {
- ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 0, 64, 0),
- ARM64_FTR_END,
-};
-
-static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_generic32[] = {
+/* Table for a single 32bit feature value */
+static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_single32[] = {
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 0, 32, 0),
ARM64_FTR_END,
};
-static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_aa64raz[] = {
- ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 0, 64, 0),
+static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_raz[] = {
ARM64_FTR_END,
};
@@ -298,15 +293,15 @@ static const struct __ftr_reg_entry {
/* Op1 = 0, CRn = 0, CRm = 4 */
ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, ftr_id_aa64pfr0),
- ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, ftr_aa64raz),
+ ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, ftr_raz),
/* Op1 = 0, CRn = 0, CRm = 5 */
ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, ftr_id_aa64dfr0),
- ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR1_EL1, ftr_generic),
+ ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR1_EL1, ftr_raz),
/* Op1 = 0, CRn = 0, CRm = 6 */
ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1, ftr_id_aa64isar0),
- ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1, ftr_aa64raz),
+ ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1, ftr_raz),
/* Op1 = 0, CRn = 0, CRm = 7 */
ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, ftr_id_aa64mmfr0),
@@ -318,7 +313,7 @@ static const struct __ftr_reg_entry {
ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_DCZID_EL0, ftr_dczid),
/* Op1 = 3, CRn = 14, CRm = 0 */
- ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_CNTFRQ_EL0, ftr_generic32),
+ ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_CNTFRQ_EL0, ftr_single32),
};
static int search_cmp_ftr_reg(const void *id, const void *regp)
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-24 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-24 13:40 [PATCH 0/9] arm64: Expose CPUID registers via emulation Suzuki K Poulose
2016-11-24 13:40 ` [PATCH 1/9] arm64: cpufeature: treat unknown fields as RES0 Suzuki K Poulose
2016-11-24 13:40 ` [PATCH 2/9] arm64: cpufeature: remove explicit RAZ fields Suzuki K Poulose
2016-11-24 13:40 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2016-11-24 13:40 ` [PATCH 4/9] arm64: cpufeature: Document the rules of safe value for features Suzuki K Poulose
2016-11-24 13:40 ` [PATCH 5/9] arm64: cpufeature: Define helpers for sys_reg id Suzuki K Poulose
2016-11-30 11:04 ` Will Deacon
2016-11-30 14:16 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-11-24 13:40 ` [PATCH 6/9] arm64: Add helper to decode register from instruction Suzuki K Poulose
2016-11-24 13:40 ` [PATCH 7/9] arm64: cpufeature: Track user visible fields Suzuki K Poulose
2016-11-24 13:40 ` [PATCH 8/9] arm64: cpufeature: Expose CPUID registers by emulation Suzuki K Poulose
2016-11-24 13:40 ` [PATCH 9/9] arm64: Documentation - Expose CPU feature registers Suzuki K Poulose
2016-11-24 18:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-11-30 11:41 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-11-30 11:14 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-11-30 11:30 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-11-30 11:33 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-11-30 11:31 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1479994809-9081-4-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ryan.arnold@linaro.org \
--cc=sid@reserved-bit.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®