From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>, Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: exec: fix ioctl kernel-doc warning
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 19:52:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <147a615b-be30-4959-baba-e56d1978c36b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231008140231.17921-1-rdunlap@infradead.org>
On 10/8/23 16:02, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> kernel-doc emits a warning:
>
> include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h:49: warning: Cannot understand * @NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_EXEC_PUSH_MAX
> on line 49 - I thought it was a doc line
>
> We don't have a way to document a macro value via kernel-doc, so
> change the "/**" kernel-doc marker to a C comment and format the comment
> more like a kernel-doc comment for consistency.
>
> Fixes: d59e75eef52d ("drm/nouveau: exec: report max pushs through getparam")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Thanks for fixing this up, applied to drm-misc-fixes.
- Danilo
> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
> Cc: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: update commit text; somehow I sent a version of the patch before
> adding the full text.
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231007005518.32015-1-rdunlap@infradead.org/
>
> include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff -- a/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ extern "C" {
> #define NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_HAS_BO_USAGE 15
> #define NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_HAS_PAGEFLIP 16
>
> -/**
> - * @NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_EXEC_PUSH_MAX
> +/*
> + * NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_EXEC_PUSH_MAX - query max pushes through getparam
> *
> * Query the maximum amount of IBs that can be pushed through a single
> * &drm_nouveau_exec structure and hence a single &DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_EXEC
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-12 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-08 14:02 Randy Dunlap
2023-10-09 21:37 ` Lyude Paul
2023-10-12 17:52 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=147a615b-be30-4959-baba-e56d1978c36b@redhat.com \
--to=dakr@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=bragathemanick0908@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kherbst@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®