mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>,
	Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>,
	Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qian Zhang <zhangqian-c@360.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] tipc: check minimum bearer MTU
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:11:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1480608678.16599.94.camel@decadent.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161201110205.10749A0F33@unicorn.suse.cz>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 716 bytes --]

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:02 +0100, Michal Kubecek wrote:
[...] 
> +/* check if device MTU is sufficient for tipc headers */
> +static inline bool tipc_check_mtu(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int reserve)
> +{
> +	if (dev->mtu >= TIPC_MIN_BEARER_MTU + reserve)
> +		return false;
> +	netdev_warn(dev, "MTU too low for tipc bearer\n");
> +	return true;
> +}
[...]

The comment says "check if ... sufficient" but the return value
indicates the opposite.  Could you make these consistent?

Other than that, this looks OK to me.  I haven't tested any version as
I don't know how to use TIPC.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular. - Adlai
Stevenson


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-01 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-01 11:02 Michal Kubecek
2016-12-01 16:11 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2016-12-01 17:52   ` Michal Kubecek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1480608678.16599.94.camel@decadent.org.uk \
    --to=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
    --cc=zhangqian-c@360.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®