From: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
To: <axboe@kernel.dk>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <paolo.valente@linaro.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] block: drop irq+lock when flushing queue plugs
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 11:27:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1480962426-15767-8-git-send-email-axboe@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480962426-15767-1-git-send-email-axboe@fb.com>
Not convinced this is a faster approach, and it does look IRQs off
longer than otherwise. With mq+scheduling, it's a problem since
it forces us to offload the queue running. If we get rid of it,
we can run the queue without the queue lock held.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 8be12ba91f8e..2c61d2020c3f 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -3204,18 +3204,21 @@ static int plug_rq_cmp(void *priv, struct list_head *a, struct list_head *b)
* plugger did not intend it.
*/
static void queue_unplugged(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int depth,
- bool from_schedule)
+ bool from_schedule, unsigned long flags)
__releases(q->queue_lock)
{
trace_block_unplug(q, depth, !from_schedule);
- if (q->mq_ops)
- blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true);
- else if (from_schedule)
- blk_run_queue_async(q);
- else
- __blk_run_queue(q);
- spin_unlock(q->queue_lock);
+ if (q->mq_ops) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
+ blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, from_schedule);
+ } else {
+ if (from_schedule)
+ blk_run_queue_async(q);
+ else
+ __blk_run_queue(q);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
+ }
}
static void flush_plug_callbacks(struct blk_plug *plug, bool from_schedule)
@@ -3283,11 +3286,6 @@ void blk_flush_plug_list(struct blk_plug *plug, bool from_schedule)
q = NULL;
depth = 0;
- /*
- * Save and disable interrupts here, to avoid doing it for every
- * queue lock we have to take.
- */
- local_irq_save(flags);
while (!list_empty(&list)) {
rq = list_entry_rq(list.next);
list_del_init(&rq->queuelist);
@@ -3297,10 +3295,10 @@ void blk_flush_plug_list(struct blk_plug *plug, bool from_schedule)
* This drops the queue lock
*/
if (q)
- queue_unplugged(q, depth, from_schedule);
+ queue_unplugged(q, depth, from_schedule, flags);
q = rq->q;
depth = 0;
- spin_lock(q->queue_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
}
/*
@@ -3329,9 +3327,7 @@ void blk_flush_plug_list(struct blk_plug *plug, bool from_schedule)
* This drops the queue lock
*/
if (q)
- queue_unplugged(q, depth, from_schedule);
-
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ queue_unplugged(q, depth, from_schedule, flags);
}
void blk_finish_plug(struct blk_plug *plug)
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-05 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-05 18:26 [PATCHSET/RFC v2] Make legacy IO schedulers work with blk-mq Jens Axboe
2016-12-05 18:27 ` [PATCH 1/7] block: use legacy path for flush requests for MQ with a scheduler Jens Axboe
2016-12-05 18:27 ` [PATCH 2/7] cfq-iosched: use appropriate run queue function Jens Axboe
2016-12-05 18:27 ` [PATCH 3/7] block: use appropriate queue running functions Jens Axboe
2016-12-05 18:27 ` [PATCH 4/7] blk-mq: blk_account_io_start() takes a bool Jens Axboe
2016-12-05 18:27 ` [PATCH 5/7] blk-mq: add BLK_MQ_F_NO_SCHED flag Jens Axboe
2016-12-05 18:27 ` [PATCH 6/7] blk-mq: test patch to get legacy IO schedulers working Jens Axboe
2016-12-05 18:27 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2016-12-06 10:01 ` [PATCHSET/RFC v2] Make legacy IO schedulers work with blk-mq Paolo Valente
2016-12-06 15:29 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1480962426-15767-8-git-send-email-axboe@fb.com \
--to=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®