From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Thomas Sailer <t.sailer@alumni.ethz.ch>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Introduce STATIC_USERMODEHELPER to mediate call_usermodehelper()
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 11:20:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1484670023.2886.10.camel@poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170116165044.GC29693@kroah.com>
On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 17:50 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> Some usermode helper applications are defined at kernel build time, while
> others can be changed at runtime. To provide a sane way to filter these, add a
> new kernel option "STATIC_USERMODEHELPER". This option routes all
> call_usermodehelper() calls through this binary, no matter what the caller
> wishes to have called.
>
> The new binary (by default set to /sbin/usermode-helper, but can be changed
> through the STATIC_USERMODEHELPER_PATH option) can properly filter the
> requested programs to be run by the kernel by looking at the first argument
> that is passed to it. All other options should then be passed onto the proper
> program if so desired.
>
> To disable all call_usermodehelper() calls by the kernel, set
> STATIC_USERMODEHELPER_PATH to an empty string.
>
> Thanks to Neil Brown for the idea of this feature.
>
> Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
> kernel/kmod.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> security/Kconfig | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kmod.c b/kernel/kmod.c
> index 426a614e97fe..0c407f905ca4 100644
> --- a/kernel/kmod.c
> +++ b/kernel/kmod.c
> @@ -528,7 +528,12 @@ struct subprocess_info *call_usermodehelper_setup(const char *path, char **argv,
> goto out;
>
> INIT_WORK(&sub_info->work, call_usermodehelper_exec_work);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STATIC_USERMODEHELPER
> + sub_info->path = CONFIG_STATIC_USERMODEHELPER_PATH;
> +#else
> sub_info->path = path;
> +#endif
> sub_info->argv = argv;
> sub_info->envp = envp;
>
> @@ -566,6 +571,15 @@ int call_usermodehelper_exec(struct subprocess_info *sub_info, int wait)
> retval = -EBUSY;
> goto out;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * If there is no binary for us to call, then just return and get out of
> + * here. This allows us to set STATIC_USERMODEHELPER_PATH to "" and
> + * disable all call_usermodehelper() calls.
> + */
> + if (strlen(sub_info->path) == 0)
> + goto out;
> +
> /*
> * Set the completion pointer only if there is a waiter.
> * This makes it possible to use umh_complete to free
> diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
> index 118f4549404e..d900f47eaa68 100644
> --- a/security/Kconfig
> +++ b/security/Kconfig
> @@ -158,6 +158,41 @@ config HARDENED_USERCOPY_PAGESPAN
> been removed. This config is intended to be used only while
> trying to find such users.
>
> +config STATIC_USERMODEHELPER
> + bool "Force all usermode helper calls through a single binary"
> + help
> + By default, the kernel can call many different userspace
> + binary programs through the "usermode helper" kernel
> + interface. Some of these binaries are statically defined
> + either in the kernel code itself, or as a kernel configuration
> + option. However, some of these are dynamically created at
> + runtime, or can be modified after the kernel has started up.
> + To provide an additional layer of security, route all of these
> + calls through a single executable that can not have its name
> + changed.
> +
> + Note, it is up to this single binary to then call the relevant
> + "real" usermode helper binary, based on the first argument
> + passed to it. If desired, this program can filter and pick
> + and choose what real programs are called.
> +
> + If you wish for all usermode helper programs are to be
> + disabled, choose this option and then set
> + STATIC_USERMODEHELPER_PATH to an empty string.
> +
> +config STATIC_USERMODEHELPER_PATH
> + string "Path to the static usermode helper binary"
> + depends on STATIC_USERMODEHELPER
> + default "/sbin/usermode-helper"
> + help
> + The binary called by the kernel when any usermode helper
> + program is wish to be run. The "real" application's name will
> + be in the first argument passed to this program on the command
> + line.
> +
> + If you wish for all usermode helper programs to be disabled,
> + specify an empty string here (i.e. "").
> +
> source security/selinux/Kconfig
> source security/smack/Kconfig
> source security/tomoyo/Kconfig
I like the core of this idea (having a single dispatch binary) a lot. It
seems like a good way to limit the attack surface. We could even
consider signing this binary as well, etc...
I'm less excited though about using the binary pathnames in argv[0].
Would it be better to pass a non-path string of some sort that the
binary would have to turn into a path to the binary to exec?
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-17 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-16 16:49 [PATCH 0/4] make call_usermodehelper a bit more "safe" Greg KH
2017-01-16 16:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] kmod: make usermodehelper path a const string Greg KH
2017-01-16 16:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] Make static usermode helper binaries constant Greg KH
2017-01-16 21:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-01-17 7:13 ` Greg KH
2017-01-17 15:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-01-17 15:29 ` Greg KH
2017-01-19 12:03 ` [kernel-hardening] " Greg KH
2017-01-19 16:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-01-17 15:45 ` Jeff Layton
2017-01-17 15:56 ` Greg KH
2017-01-17 16:07 ` Jeff Layton
2017-01-17 16:12 ` Greg KH
2017-01-16 16:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] Introduce STATIC_USERMODEHELPER to mediate call_usermodehelper() Greg KH
2017-01-17 16:20 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2017-01-17 16:26 ` Greg KH
2017-01-17 16:52 ` Jeff Layton
2017-01-16 16:51 ` [PATCH 0/4] make call_usermodehelper a bit more "safe" Greg KH
2017-01-17 17:23 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1484670023.2886.10.camel@poochiereds.net \
--to=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=t.sailer@alumni.ethz.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®