From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] x86/fpu: Split the state handling in fpu__drop()
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:26:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1485429989-23340-5-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485429989-23340-1-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org>
Prepare fpu__drop() to use fpu->fpregs_active.
There are two distinct usecases for fpu__drop() in this context:
exit_thread() when called for 'current' in exit(), and when called
for another task in fork().
This patch does not change behavior, it only adds a couple of
debug checks and structures the code to make the ->fpregs_active
change more obviously correct.
All the complications will be removed later on.
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
index 7e1c77ac90e8..2973afdb39f1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
@@ -414,12 +414,19 @@ void fpu__drop(struct fpu *fpu)
{
preempt_disable();
- if (fpu->fpregs_active) {
- /* Ignore delayed exceptions from user space */
- asm volatile("1: fwait\n"
- "2:\n"
- _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 2b));
- fpregs_deactivate(fpu);
+ if (fpu == ¤t->thread.fpu) {
+ WARN_ON_FPU(fpu->fpstate_active != fpu->fpregs_active);
+
+ if (fpu->fpregs_active) {
+ /* Ignore delayed exceptions from user space */
+ asm volatile("1: fwait\n"
+ "2:\n"
+ _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 2b));
+ if (fpu->fpregs_active)
+ fpregs_deactivate(fpu);
+ }
+ } else {
+ WARN_ON_FPU(fpu->fpregs_active);
}
fpu->fpstate_active = 0;
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-26 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-26 11:26 [PATCH 0/7] x86/fpu: Simplify the FPU state machine Ingo Molnar
2017-01-26 11:26 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/fpu: Simplify the fpu->last_cpu logic and rename it to fpu->fpregs_cached Ingo Molnar
2017-01-26 14:23 ` Rik van Riel
2017-01-26 14:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-26 15:05 ` [PATCH] x86/fpu: Unify the naming of the FPU register cache validity flags Ingo Molnar
2017-01-26 15:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-26 14:54 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/fpu: Simplify the fpu->last_cpu logic and rename it to fpu->fpregs_cached Rik van Riel
2017-01-26 15:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-26 16:51 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-26 11:26 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86/fpu: Simplify fpu->fpregs_active use Ingo Molnar
2017-01-26 16:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-26 11:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86/fpu: Make the fpu state change in fpu__clear() scheduler-atomic Ingo Molnar
2017-01-26 11:26 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2017-01-26 11:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86/fpu: Change fpu->fpregs_active users to fpu->fpstate_active Ingo Molnar
2017-01-26 14:44 ` Rik van Riel
2017-01-26 15:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-26 15:45 ` Rik van Riel
2017-01-26 15:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-26 17:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-26 18:04 ` Rik van Riel
2017-01-26 11:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86/fpu: Decouple fpregs_activate()/fpregs_deactivate() from fpu->fpregs_active Ingo Molnar
2017-01-26 11:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86/fpu: Remove struct fpu::fpregs_active Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1485429989-23340-5-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome