From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751360AbdA2Vzu (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jan 2017 16:55:50 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:54030 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750788AbdA2VzG (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jan 2017 16:55:06 -0500 X-Auth-Info: meoxbdO+Qi7n1XeSAb8IheuROMc7TzLFtyB6uY/FWE0= From: Lukasz Majewski To: Thierry Reding , Sascha Hauer , Stefan Agner , Boris Brezillon , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Bhuvanchandra DV , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Lothar Wassmann , kernel@pengutronix.de, Fabio Estevam , Lukasz Majewski , Lukasz Majewski Subject: [PATCH v5 08/11] pwm: imx: Remove redundant i.MX PWMv2 code Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 22:54:12 +0100 Message-Id: <1485726855-16236-9-git-send-email-lukma@denx.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 In-Reply-To: <1485726855-16236-1-git-send-email-lukma@denx.de> References: <1485726855-16236-1-git-send-email-lukma@denx.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The code providing functionality surpassed by the atomic PWM is not needed anymore and hence can be removed. Suggested-by: Stefan Agner Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon --- Changes for v5: - None Changes for v4: - None Changes for v3: - None Changes for v2: - None --- drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 127 -------------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 127 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c index fdaa11b..e037023 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c @@ -53,10 +53,6 @@ struct imx_chip { void __iomem *mmio_base; struct pwm_chip chip; - - int (*config)(struct pwm_chip *chip, - struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns); - void (*set_enable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool enable); }; #define to_imx_chip(chip) container_of(chip, struct imx_chip, chip) @@ -160,95 +156,6 @@ static void imx_pwm_wait_fifo_slot(struct pwm_chip *chip, } } -static int imx_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip, - struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns) -{ - struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip); - unsigned long long c; - unsigned long period_cycles, duty_cycles, prescale; - bool enable = pwm_is_enabled(pwm); - u32 cr; - - /* - * i.MX PWMv2 has a 4-word sample FIFO. - * In order to avoid FIFO overflow issue, we do software reset - * to clear all sample FIFO if the controller is disabled or - * wait for a full PWM cycle to get a relinquished FIFO slot - * when the controller is enabled and the FIFO is fully loaded. - */ - if (enable) - imx_pwm_wait_fifo_slot(chip, pwm); - else - imx_pwm_sw_reset(chip); - - c = clk_get_rate(imx->clk_per); - c = c * period_ns; - do_div(c, 1000000000); - period_cycles = c; - - prescale = period_cycles / 0x10000 + 1; - - period_cycles /= prescale; - c = (unsigned long long)period_cycles * duty_ns; - do_div(c, period_ns); - duty_cycles = c; - - /* - * according to imx pwm RM, the real period value should be - * PERIOD value in PWMPR plus 2. - */ - if (period_cycles > 2) - period_cycles -= 2; - else - period_cycles = 0; - - writel(duty_cycles, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMSAR); - writel(period_cycles, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMPR); - - cr = MX3_PWMCR_PRESCALER(prescale) | - MX3_PWMCR_DOZEEN | MX3_PWMCR_WAITEN | - MX3_PWMCR_DBGEN | MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG_HIGH; - - if (enable) - cr |= MX3_PWMCR_EN; - - writel(cr, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR); - - return 0; -} - -static void imx_pwm_set_enable_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool enable) -{ - struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip); - u32 val; - - val = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR); - - if (enable) - val |= MX3_PWMCR_EN; - else - val &= ~MX3_PWMCR_EN; - - writel(val, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR); -} - -static int imx_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, - struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns) -{ - struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip); - int ret; - - ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_per); - if (ret) - return ret; - - ret = imx->config(chip, pwm, duty_ns, period_ns); - - clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per); - - return ret; -} - static int imx_pwm_apply_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, struct pwm_state *state) { @@ -316,29 +223,6 @@ static int imx_pwm_apply_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, return 0; } -static int imx_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) -{ - struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip); - int ret; - - ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_per); - if (ret) - return ret; - - imx->set_enable(chip, true); - - return 0; -} - -static void imx_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) -{ - struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip); - - imx->set_enable(chip, false); - - clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per); -} - static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v1 = { .enable = imx_pwm_enable_v1, .disable = imx_pwm_disable_v1, @@ -348,16 +232,10 @@ static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v1 = { static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v2 = { .apply = imx_pwm_apply_v2, - .enable = imx_pwm_enable, - .disable = imx_pwm_disable, - .config = imx_pwm_config, .owner = THIS_MODULE, }; struct imx_pwm_data { - int (*config)(struct pwm_chip *chip, - struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns); - void (*set_enable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool enable); struct pwm_ops *pwm_ops; }; @@ -366,8 +244,6 @@ static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v1 = { }; static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v2 = { - .config = imx_pwm_config_v2, - .set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v2, .pwm_ops = &imx_pwm_ops_v2, }; @@ -414,9 +290,6 @@ static int imx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (IS_ERR(imx->mmio_base)) return PTR_ERR(imx->mmio_base); - imx->config = data->config; - imx->set_enable = data->set_enable; - ret = pwmchip_add(&imx->chip); if (ret < 0) return ret; -- 2.1.4