From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753235AbaJFRtF (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2014 13:49:05 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:58315 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752251AbaJFRtD (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2014 13:49:03 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 19:48:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Stefan Wahren Reply-To: Stefan Wahren To: Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown Cc: linux-kernel , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1486422791.288728.1412617735622.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbaltgw54.schlund.de> Subject: Regulator: Questions about constraints MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Medium X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.6.0-Rev19 X-Originating-Client: com.openexchange.ox.gui.dhtml X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:l8dNql5VjB63cqLM7gf1sPWAqlobL0x0Eqm40Oz7xjr tar2I22l9NFNPdzfMbcuYdoqmTdOEdTfifeCOBWfuGvMi8OanX vovn5xJqlR1heX19YIavO3vWym9tRBZG+UUmFbfCyxRNvIA+2T pVSc4lLx1aFry3VBK3oPOmh917ktASFL6LiCHKTzeKjyKlyxv1 I+X7Qe5XtqzVM5vDc7ceymVL2uCcXyhzjgMXK44xGP4cIF6Nby h62anVgaVsHnte7rWwIofgMWxkaa5GFvDc66pmqUkCCmurTa+5 FMoJkHkLcwIBlcY2R5tjYtbkodJHfyHbr2cXXi5CkAGCmvL7+S 9L0VKBMuD2OzvN4RNNAdYLTkl1tDfVOGsQimREMMz3rWldG5Iu zLjbXNRokuhkHIwq+U4VsTapK4wblCGLuuPgiGQjeFMzYjL/wk tsIHPzjGxA1smaWux31mrV82jaQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, currently i'm porting a regulator driver and i've two question about regulator constraints and DT binding: Should a regulator driver rely on DT regulator constraints or not? In case the constraints are not set by DT, what is the recommend behavior of a regulator driver? Best regards Stefan