From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, juri.lelli@gmail.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/deadline: Change the way to replenish runtime for sleep tasks
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 12:10:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1487819438-3364-2-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487819438-3364-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
Let's consider the following example.
timeline : o...................o.........o.......o..o
^ ^ ^ ^ ^
| | | | |
start | | | |
original runtime | | |
sleep with (-)runtime | |
original deadline |
wake up
When this task is woken up, a negative runtime should be considered,
which means that the task should get penalized when assigning runtime,
becasue it already spent more than expected.
Current code handles this by replenishing a runtime in hrtimer callback
for deadline. But this approach has room for improvement in two ways:
1. No need to keep the hrtimer for a sleep task because it can be
handled when waking it up.
2. It will be replenished twice unnecessarily if the task sleeps for
long time so that the deadline, assigned in the hrtimer callback,
also passed. In other words, one happens in the callback and the
other happens in update_dl_entiry() when waking it up.
So try to cancel the hrtimer for a sleep task and make all these things
handled when waking it up.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 69e3fbb..b59ee7b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -507,8 +507,10 @@ static void update_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se);
struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq);
- if (dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, rq_clock(rq)) ||
- dl_entity_overflow(dl_se, pi_se, rq_clock(rq))) {
+ if (dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, rq_clock(rq)))
+ __replenish_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se);
+
+ if (dl_entity_overflow(dl_se, pi_se, rq_clock(rq))) {
dl_se->deadline = rq_clock(rq) + pi_se->dl_deadline;
dl_se->runtime = pi_se->dl_runtime;
}
@@ -981,6 +983,9 @@ static void dequeue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
update_curr_dl(rq);
__dequeue_task_dl(rq, p, flags);
+
+ if (flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP)
+ hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&p->dl.dl_timer);
}
/*
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-23 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-23 3:10 [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/deadline: Factor out the actual work replenishing runtime Byungchul Park
2017-02-23 3:10 ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2017-02-23 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/deadline: Change the way to replenish runtime for sleep tasks byungchul.park
2017-02-23 6:14 ` Byungchul Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1487819438-3364-2-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com \
--to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®