From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030828AbeCANdr (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2018 08:33:47 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f68.google.com ([74.125.83.68]:41595 "EHLO mail-pg0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030443AbeCANdk (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2018 08:33:40 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELu4AFInX3ksVBMAhIcbqnkRkncBJxj7rmja4K7N1bY7VBb9aPomHd25yoQFMFqXwkCNzWjARg== Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] clk: tegra: Mark HCLK, SCLK and EMC as critical From: Dmitry Osipenko To: Peter De Schrijver , Prashant Gaikwad , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <699ce67980d71fd315085ea9785ee6213e0772cb.1515589507.git.digetx@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1487f4a9-d924-3366-c86a-f1bd33ebb1bf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 16:33:29 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 15.01.2018 13:56, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > On 10.01.2018 16:59, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> Machine dies if HCLK, SCLK or EMC is disabled. Hence mark these clocks >> as critical. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko >> Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver >> --- >> >> Change log: >> v2: Fixed accidentally missed marking EMC as critical on Tegra30 and >> Tegra124. Switched to a use of common EMC gate definition on Tegra20 >> and Tegra30. >> >> v3: Dropped marking PLL_P outputs as critical, because seems they are >> not so critical. Although, I still haven't got a definitive answer >> about what exact HW functions are affected by the fixed-clocks. >> Anyway it should be cleaner to correct the actual drivers. > > Stephen / Michael, would it be possible to schedule these patches for 4.16? My > T20 and T30 devices aren't working without the 'critical clocks' patch. Things > happen to work with the opensource u-boot, but not with the proprietary > bootloader. It's probably not a big deal that out-of-tree devices are broken, > although would be nice to have one problem less. Guys, is there anything I could do to get these patches in linux-next?