From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH-tip v2 2/3] locking/rwsem: relocate rwsem_down_read_failed()
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 14:04:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1488827083-30078-3-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488827083-30078-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
The rwsem_down_read_failed() function was relocted from above the
optimistic spinning section to below that section. This enables
it to use functions in that section in future patches. There is no
code change.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index f31dd61b..be638ca 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -219,54 +219,6 @@ static void __rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
}
/*
- * Wait for the read lock to be granted
- */
-__visible
-struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- long count, adjustment = -RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS;
- struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
- DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
-
- waiter.task = current;
- waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ;
-
- raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
- if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
- adjustment += RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS;
- list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
-
- /* we're now waiting on the lock, but no longer actively locking */
- count = atomic_long_add_return(adjustment, &sem->count);
-
- /*
- * If there are no active locks, wake the front queued process(es).
- *
- * If there are no writers and we are first in the queue,
- * wake our own waiter to join the existing active readers !
- */
- if (count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS ||
- (count > RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS &&
- adjustment != -RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS))
- __rwsem_mark_wake(sem, RWSEM_WAKE_ANY, &wake_q);
-
- raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
- wake_up_q(&wake_q);
-
- /* wait to be given the lock */
- while (true) {
- set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- if (!waiter.task)
- break;
- schedule();
- }
-
- __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
- return sem;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rwsem_down_read_failed);
-
-/*
* This function must be called with the sem->wait_lock held to prevent
* race conditions between checking the rwsem wait list and setting the
* sem->count accordingly.
@@ -461,6 +413,54 @@ static inline bool rwsem_has_spinner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
#endif
/*
+ * Wait for the read lock to be granted
+ */
+__visible
+struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ long count, adjustment = -RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS;
+ struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
+ DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
+
+ waiter.task = current;
+ waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
+ if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
+ adjustment += RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS;
+ list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
+
+ /* we're now waiting on the lock, but no longer actively locking */
+ count = atomic_long_add_return(adjustment, &sem->count);
+
+ /*
+ * If there are no active locks, wake the front queued process(es).
+ *
+ * If there are no writers and we are first in the queue,
+ * wake our own waiter to join the existing active readers !
+ */
+ if (count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS ||
+ (count > RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS &&
+ adjustment != -RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS))
+ __rwsem_mark_wake(sem, RWSEM_WAKE_ANY, &wake_q);
+
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
+ wake_up_q(&wake_q);
+
+ /* wait to be given the lock */
+ while (true) {
+ set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ if (!waiter.task)
+ break;
+ schedule();
+ }
+
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ return sem;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rwsem_down_read_failed);
+
+/*
* Wait until we successfully acquire the write lock
*/
static inline struct rw_semaphore *
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-06 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-06 19:04 [PATCH-tip v2 0/3] locking/rwsem: Minor twists to improve rwsem performance Waiman Long
2017-03-06 19:04 ` [PATCH-tip v2 1/3] locking/rwsem: Check wait_list without lock if spinner present Waiman Long
2017-03-06 19:04 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2017-03-06 19:04 ` [PATCH-tip v2 3/3] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1488827083-30078-3-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®