From: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Jasper Spaans <jasper@spaans.ds9a.nl>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] raid5 crash with 2.4.0-test12 [Was: Linux-2.4.0-test12]
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:17:19 +1100 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14902.49167.834682.925490@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: message from Linus Torvalds on Tuesday December 12
In-Reply-To: <14902.45844.964925.199379@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10012121539000.2348-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
On Tuesday December 12, torvalds@transmeta.com wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Neil Brown wrote:
> >
> > Could you add this test to the top of md_make_request as well, because
> > requests to raid5 don't go through generic_make_request.
>
> Sure they do. Everything that calls ll_rw_block() or submit_bh() will go
> through generic_make_request.
>
> Neil, you're probably thinking about __make_request(), which only triggers
> for "normal" devices.
Yes... you are right. Alright, I can't escape it any other way so I
guess I must admit that it is a raid5 bug.
But how can raid5 be calling b_end_io on a buffer_head that was never
passed to generic_make_request?
Answer, it snoops on the buffer cache to try to do complete stripe
writes.
The following patch disabled that code.
NeilBrown
--- drivers/md/raid5.c 2000/12/13 00:13:54 1.1
+++ drivers/md/raid5.c 2000/12/13 00:14:07
@@ -1009,6 +1009,7 @@
struct buffer_head *bh;
int method1 = INT_MAX, method2 = INT_MAX;
+#if 0
/*
* Attempt to add entries :-)
*/
@@ -1039,6 +1040,7 @@
atomic_dec(&bh->b_count);
}
}
+#endif
PRINTK("handle_stripe() -- begin writing, stripe %lu\n", sh->sector);
/*
* Writing, need to update parity buffer.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-13 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-12 2:52 Linux-2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds
2000-12-12 15:06 ` [BUG] raid5 crash with 2.4.0-test12 [Was: Linux-2.4.0-test12] Jasper Spaans
2000-12-12 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-12-12 19:56 ` Neil Brown
2000-12-12 20:07 ` Jasper Spaans
2000-12-12 22:41 ` Jasper Spaans
2000-12-12 23:21 ` Neil Brown
2000-12-12 23:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-12-13 0:17 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2000-12-13 3:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-12-13 11:52 ` Jasper Spaans
2000-12-13 23:15 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14902.49167.834682.925490@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au \
--to=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
--cc=jasper@spaans.ds9a.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®