From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
<kernel-team@lge.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] zram: use zram_slot_lock instead of raw bit_spin_lock op
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 14:17:31 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491196653-7388-4-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1491196653-7388-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org>
With this clean-up phase, I want to use zram's wrapper function
to lock table access which is more consistent with other zram's
functions.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
---
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index 7938f4b98b01..71b0a584bc85 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -415,24 +415,39 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(io_stat);
static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(mm_stat);
static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(debug_stat);
+
+static void zram_slot_lock(struct zram *zram, u32 index)
+{
+ struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
+
+ bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+}
+
+static void zram_slot_unlock(struct zram *zram, u32 index)
+{
+ struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
+
+ bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+}
+
static bool zram_special_page_read(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
struct page *page,
unsigned int offset, unsigned int len)
{
struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
- bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
if (unlikely(!meta->table[index].handle) ||
zram_test_flag(meta, index, ZRAM_SAME)) {
void *mem;
- bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
mem = kmap_atomic(page);
zram_fill_page(mem + offset, len, meta->table[index].element);
kunmap_atomic(mem);
return true;
}
- bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
return false;
}
@@ -448,11 +463,11 @@ static bool zram_special_page_write(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
kunmap_atomic(mem);
/* Free memory associated with this sector now. */
- bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
zram_free_page(zram, index);
zram_set_flag(meta, index, ZRAM_SAME);
zram_set_element(meta, index, element);
- bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.same_pages);
return true;
@@ -559,7 +574,7 @@ static int zram_decompress_page(struct zram *zram, struct page *page, u32 index)
if (zram_special_page_read(zram, index, page, 0, PAGE_SIZE))
return 0;
- bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
handle = meta->table[index].handle;
size = zram_get_obj_size(meta, index);
@@ -578,7 +593,7 @@ static int zram_decompress_page(struct zram *zram, struct page *page, u32 index)
zcomp_stream_put(zram->comp);
}
zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, handle);
- bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
/* Should NEVER happen. Return bio error if it does. */
if (unlikely(ret))
@@ -731,11 +746,11 @@ static int __zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
* Free memory associated with this sector
* before overwriting unused sectors.
*/
- bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
zram_free_page(zram, index);
meta->table[index].handle = handle;
zram_set_obj_size(meta, index, comp_len);
- bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
/* Update stats */
atomic64_add(comp_len, &zram->stats.compr_data_size);
@@ -793,7 +808,6 @@ static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
int offset, struct bio *bio)
{
size_t n = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
- struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
/*
* zram manages data in physical block size units. Because logical block
@@ -814,9 +828,9 @@ static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
}
while (n >= PAGE_SIZE) {
- bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
zram_free_page(zram, index);
- bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.notify_free);
index++;
n -= PAGE_SIZE;
@@ -925,9 +939,9 @@ static void zram_slot_free_notify(struct block_device *bdev,
zram = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
meta = zram->meta;
- bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
zram_free_page(zram, index);
- bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.notify_free);
}
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-03 5:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-03 5:17 [PATCH 0/5] zram clean up Minchan Kim
2017-04-03 5:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] zram: handle multiple pages attached bio's bvec Minchan Kim
2017-04-03 22:45 ` Andrew Morton
2017-04-03 23:13 ` Minchan Kim
2017-04-04 4:55 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-04-03 5:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] zram: partial IO refactoring Minchan Kim
2017-04-03 5:52 ` Mika Penttilä
2017-04-03 6:12 ` Minchan Kim
2017-04-03 6:57 ` Mika Penttilä
2017-04-04 2:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-04-04 4:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-04-03 5:17 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2017-04-03 6:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] zram: use zram_slot_lock instead of raw bit_spin_lock op Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-04-03 6:34 ` Minchan Kim
2017-04-03 8:06 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-04-04 2:18 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-04-04 4:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-04-03 5:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] zram: remove zram_meta structure Minchan Kim
2017-04-04 2:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-04-04 4:52 ` Minchan Kim
2017-04-04 5:40 ` Minchan Kim
2017-04-04 5:54 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-04-03 5:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] zram: introduce zram data accessor Minchan Kim
2017-04-04 4:40 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-04-11 5:38 ` [PATCH 0/5] zram clean up Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1491196653-7388-4-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome