From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 03:11:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 03:11:44 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:54153 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 03:11:29 -0500 From: "David S. Miller" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14942.48157.259491.78067@pizda.ninka.net> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 00:11:09 -0800 (PST) To: Lars Marowsky-Bree Cc: Christoph Lameter , khttpd-users@zgp.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: khttpd beaten by boa In-Reply-To: <20010112084259.B441@marowsky-bree.de> In-Reply-To: <20010112084259.B441@marowsky-bree.de> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 13) "Crater Lake" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Lars Marowsky-Bree writes: > This just goes on to show that khttpd is unnecessary kernel bloat > and can be "just as well" handled by a userspace application, minus > some rather very special cases which do not justify its inclusion > into the main kernel. My take on this is that khttpd is unmaintained garbage. TUX is evidence that khttpd can be done properly and beat the pants off of anything done in userspace. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/