From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 17:56:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 17:56:34 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:35990 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 17:56:29 -0500 From: "David S. Miller" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14944.56558.198555.536993@pizda.ninka.net> Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 14:55:42 -0800 (PST) To: Petru Paler Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc64 compile fix In-Reply-To: <20010113152104.B2734@ppetru.net> In-Reply-To: <20010113152104.B2734@ppetru.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 13) "Crater Lake" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Petru Paler writes: > - struct dqblk d; > + struct dqblk32 d; What does this fix? Things compile just fine without it and looking at the code it was intended to be of the original type. Please explain exactly what submitted patches fix in the future, thanks. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/