From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 16:15:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 16:15:48 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:41610 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 16:15:33 -0500 From: "David S. Miller" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14960.38705.859136.36297@pizda.ninka.net> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 13:14:25 -0800 (PST) To: Ion Badulescu Cc: , , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <14960.36869.977528.642327@pizda.ninka.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 13) "Crater Lake" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ion Badulescu writes: > I'm just wondering, if a card supports sg but *not* TX csum, is it worth > it to make use of sg? eepro100 falls into this category.. No, not worth it for now. In fact I'm going to mark that combination (sg without csum) as illegal in the final zerocopy patch I end up sending to Linus. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/