From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750905AbdE3CUb (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2017 22:20:31 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0102.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.102]:48589 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750750AbdE3CUa (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2017 22:20:30 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1540:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2693:2828:2906:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3874:4321:5007:8957:10004:10400:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12296:12740:12760:12895:13069:13161:13229:13311:13357:13439:14096:14097:14180:14181:14659:14721:21060:21080:21433:21451:21627:30029:30054:30060:30062:30090:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:18,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: grip04_7866254ff3d1b X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1988 Message-ID: <1496110825.2618.7.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree From: Joe Perches To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mike Frysinger , Steven Miao Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 19:20:25 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170530021404.GT3956@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20170529160209.5230c05b@canb.auug.org.au> <20170529211505.GP3956@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170530114050.2b702cc1@canb.auug.org.au> <1496109266.2618.5.camel@perches.com> <20170530021404.GT3956@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2017-05-29 at 19:14 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 06:54:26PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 11:40 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > > On Mon, 29 May 2017 14:15:05 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > > > > > > > > Anyone see any other options? > > > > My preferred option would be removing pr_fmt > > and adding a couple new macros. > > Not sure how to evaluate yours and Stephen's changes, but I reverted my > conversion to a macro based on the hope that something good will come > of this effort. ;-) Stephen's suggestion makes the format and arguments have an apparent mismatch. What I suggested hides the "module %s: ", mod->name bit in the macros (like the older pr_fmt use), allows anyone else to #define pr_fmt to taste, and keeps the format and arguments in agreement.