Re: [PATCH-wq v2 3/5] workqueue: Thaw frozen pwq in workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask()

[Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>]

On 2/4/24 05:15, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Waiman,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on tj-wq/for-next]
> [also build test WARNING on next-20240202]
> [cannot apply to linus/master v6.8-rc2]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Waiman-Long/workqueue-Skip-__WQ_DESTROYING-workqueues-when-updating-global-unbound-cpumask/20240203-234626
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git for-next
> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240203154334.791910-4-longman%40redhat.com
> patch subject: [PATCH-wq v2 3/5] workqueue: Thaw frozen pwq in workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask()
> config: x86_64-randconfig-122-20240204 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240204/202402041854.YeHAF3wV-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240204/202402041854.YeHAF3wV-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402041854.YeHAF3wV-lkp@intel.com/
>
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>     kernel/workqueue.c:361:40: sparse: sparse: duplicate [noderef]
>     kernel/workqueue.c:361:40: sparse: sparse: multiple address spaces given: __percpu & __rcu
>>> kernel/workqueue.c:6373:25: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
>     kernel/workqueue.c:6373:25: sparse:    struct pool_workqueue *
>     kernel/workqueue.c:6373:25: sparse:    struct pool_workqueue [noderef] __rcu *

OK, I didn't realize that a __rcu tag is added to the dfl_pwq in 6.9. 
Will change the patch series to use the appropriate helpers to avoid 
this kind of warnings.

Cheers,
Longman