From: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 13:00:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1500289258-3700-1-git-send-email-alexandre.torgue@st.com> (raw)
Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h"
and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX).
Since this approach was approved, the number of supported MCU has
increased (STM32F429/STM32F469/STM32f746/STM32H743). To avoid to add a new
file in "include/dt-bindings" each time a new STM32 SOC arrives I propose
a new approach which consist to use a macro to define pin muxing in device
tree. All STM32 DT will use the common macro to define pinmux. Furthermore, it
will make easy maintenance and integration of new SOC.
To check that patch generate same dtb than befrore I used dtc binary to (re)generate dts files
(before and after apply the series).
Example on stm32f469-disco:
./scripts/dtc/dtc -I dtb -O dts -o stm32f469-disco-after.dts
stm32f469-disco-after.dtb
./scripts/dtc/dtc -I dtb -O dts -o stm32f469-disco-before.dts
stm32f469-disco-before.dtb
Then diff -u stm32f469-disco-before.dts stm32f469-disco-after.dts
Regards
Alex
Alexandre TORGUE (1):
ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi | 176 ++--
include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/stm32-pinfunc.h | 61 ++
include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/stm32f429-pinfunc.h | 1239 -----------------------
3 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 1327 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/stm32-pinfunc.h
delete mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/stm32f429-pinfunc.h
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2017-07-17 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-17 11:00 Alexandre TORGUE [this message]
2017-07-17 11:00 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2017-07-17 11:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-07-17 11:19 ` Alexandre Torgue
2017-08-02 9:32 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1500289258-3700-1-git-send-email-alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--to=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®