mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, bp@suse.de,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/amd: Derive L3 shared_cpu_map from cpu_llc_shared_mask
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 04:52:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1500544328-2132-1-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> (raw)

With X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT, current logic default to using APIC ID
to calculate cpumask for shared_cpu_map. However, since APIC IDs
are not guarantee to be contiguous for cores across different L3,
such as in family17h system w/ downcore configuration.
This results in incorrect L3 shared_cpu_map.

Instead, it should be safe to always use the pre-calculated
cpu_llc_shared_mask to derive L3 shared_cpu_map.

Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
index c55fb2c..10427bb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
@@ -811,7 +811,20 @@ static int __cache_amd_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index,
 	struct cacheinfo *this_leaf;
 	int i, sibling;
 
-	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)) {
+	if (index == 3) {
+		for_each_cpu(i, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu)) {
+			this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(i);
+			if (!this_cpu_ci->info_list)
+				continue;
+			this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
+			for_each_cpu(sibling, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu)) {
+				if (!cpu_online(sibling))
+					continue;
+				cpumask_set_cpu(sibling,
+						&this_leaf->shared_cpu_map);
+			}
+		}
+	} else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)) {
 		unsigned int apicid, nshared, first, last;
 
 		this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
@@ -839,19 +852,6 @@ static int __cache_amd_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index,
 						&this_leaf->shared_cpu_map);
 			}
 		}
-	} else if (index == 3) {
-		for_each_cpu(i, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu)) {
-			this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(i);
-			if (!this_cpu_ci->info_list)
-				continue;
-			this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
-			for_each_cpu(sibling, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu)) {
-				if (!cpu_online(sibling))
-					continue;
-				cpumask_set_cpu(sibling,
-						&this_leaf->shared_cpu_map);
-			}
-		}
 	} else
 		return 0;
 
-- 
2.7.4

             reply	other threads:[~2017-07-20  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-20  9:52 Suravee Suthikulpanit [this message]
2017-07-26  3:51 ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1500544328-2132-1-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®