From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: The IO problem on multiple PCI busses
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:09:00 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15006.40524.929644.25622@pizda.ninka.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19350124090521.18330@mailhost.mipsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <19350124090521.18330@mailhost.mipsys.com>
Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> I'm, of course open to any comments about this (in fact, I'd really like
> some feedback). One thing is that we also need to find a way to pass
> those infos to userland. Currently, we implement an arch-specific syscall
> that allow to retreive the IO physical base of a given PCI bus. That may
> be enough, but we may also want something that match more closely what we
> do in the kernel.
Same problem on sparc64. Using a special PCI syscall is fine, _if_ we
all end up using the same one. However, I would prefer another
mechanism...
I think a cleaner scheme is to allow mmap() on
/proc/bus/pci/${BUS}/${DEVICE} nodes, that is much cleaner and solves
transparently any "different word size between userland and kernel"
issues (specifically 32-bit userlands executing on 64-bit kernels).
I played around with something akin to this, and some of the necessary
Xfree86-4.0.x hackery needed, some time ago. But I never finished
this.
Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-01 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-01 15:33 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-01 15:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-01 18:30 ` Alan Cox
2001-03-01 19:09 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2001-03-01 19:33 ` Dan Malek
2001-03-01 19:41 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-01 19:59 ` Dan Malek
2001-03-01 20:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-01 20:22 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-01 20:27 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-02 11:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-03 1:08 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-01 19:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-01 20:21 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-01 22:26 ` Alan Cox
2001-03-02 11:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-03 1:06 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-03 2:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-03 11:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-03-03 17:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-05 16:20 ` David Woodhouse
2001-03-06 23:01 ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-03-07 2:07 ` Tony Mantler
2001-03-05 23:21 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-03-02 1:22 Grant Grundler
2001-03-02 2:19 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-02 17:46 ` Grant Grundler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15006.40524.929644.25622@pizda.ninka.net \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®