From: minyard@acm.org
To: Weilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>
Cc: openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ipmi: fix unsigned long underflow
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 21:20:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1501381228-30958-1-git-send-email-minyard@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1501296161-74544-1-git-send-email-chenweilong@huawei.com>
From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
When I set the timeout to a specific value such as 500ms, the timeout
event will not happen in time due to the overflow in function
check_msg_timeout:
...
ent->timeout -= timeout_period;
if (ent->timeout > 0)
return;
...
The type of timeout_period is long, but ent->timeout is unsigned long.
This patch makes the type consistent.
Reported-by: Weilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
---
I like to keep things consistent (though I obviously messed up here)
and keep variables that should be positive unsigned.
But you are right, there is a bug here and some inconsistency.
This patch changes timeout_period to be unsigned and fixes the
check. Can you try this out?
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
index 810b138..c82d9fd 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
@@ -4030,7 +4030,8 @@ smi_from_recv_msg(ipmi_smi_t intf, struct ipmi_recv_msg *recv_msg,
}
static void check_msg_timeout(ipmi_smi_t intf, struct seq_table *ent,
- struct list_head *timeouts, long timeout_period,
+ struct list_head *timeouts,
+ unsigned long timeout_period,
int slot, unsigned long *flags,
unsigned int *waiting_msgs)
{
@@ -4043,8 +4044,8 @@ static void check_msg_timeout(ipmi_smi_t intf, struct seq_table *ent,
if (!ent->inuse)
return;
- ent->timeout -= timeout_period;
- if (ent->timeout > 0) {
+ if (timeout_period < ent->timeout) {
+ ent->timeout -= timeout_period;
(*waiting_msgs)++;
return;
}
@@ -4110,7 +4111,8 @@ static void check_msg_timeout(ipmi_smi_t intf, struct seq_table *ent,
}
}
-static unsigned int ipmi_timeout_handler(ipmi_smi_t intf, long timeout_period)
+static unsigned int ipmi_timeout_handler(ipmi_smi_t intf,
+ unsigned long timeout_period)
{
struct list_head timeouts;
struct ipmi_recv_msg *msg, *msg2;
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-30 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-29 2:42 [PATCH] ipmi: fix unsigned long overflow Weilong Chen
2017-07-30 2:20 ` minyard [this message]
2017-08-07 8:41 ` [PATCH] ipmi: fix unsigned long underflow Weilong Chen
2017-08-07 12:24 ` Corey Minyard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1501381228-30958-1-git-send-email-minyard@acm.org \
--to=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=chenweilong@huawei.com \
--cc=cminyard@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®