mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>
To: <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: <agraf@suse.com>, <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	<christoffer.dall@linaro.org>, <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	<james.hogan@imgtec.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <weidong.huang@huawei.com>,
	<arei.gonglei@huawei.com>, <wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com>,
	<longpeng.mike@gmail.com>, <david@redhat.com>,
	"Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: add spinlock optimization framework
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 12:05:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1502165135-4784-2-git-send-email-longpeng2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502165135-4784-1-git-send-email-longpeng2@huawei.com>

If the vcpu(me) exit due to request a usermode spinlock, then
the spinlock-holder may be preempted in usermode or kernmode.

But if the vcpu(me) is in kernmode, then the holder must be
preempted in kernmode, so we should choose a vcpu in kernmode
as the most eligible candidate.

This introduces kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel() to decide whether the
vcpu is in kernel-mode when it's preempted or spinlock exit.

Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com>
---
 arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c   | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 2 +-
 arch/mips/kvm/mips.c         | 6 ++++++
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c   | 6 ++++++
 arch/s390/kvm/diag.c         | 2 +-
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c     | 6 ++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c        | 2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c           | 4 +++-
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c           | 2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c           | 6 ++++++
 include/linux/kvm_host.h     | 3 ++-
 virt/kvm/arm/arm.c           | 5 +++++
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c          | 4 +++-
 13 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
index 54442e3..a7ea5db 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static int kvm_handle_wfx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 	if (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & HSR_WFI_IS_WFE) {
 		trace_kvm_wfx(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), true);
 		vcpu->stat.wfe_exit_stat++;
-		kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu);
+		kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(vcpu));
 	} else {
 		trace_kvm_wfx(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), false);
 		vcpu->stat.wfi_exit_stat++;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
index 17d8a16..d6c8cb6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static int kvm_handle_wfx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 	if (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_WFx_ISS_WFE) {
 		trace_kvm_wfx_arm64(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), true);
 		vcpu->stat.wfe_exit_stat++;
-		kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu);
+		kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(vcpu));
 	} else {
 		trace_kvm_wfx_arm64(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), false);
 		vcpu->stat.wfi_exit_stat++;
diff --git a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
index d4b2ad1..70208be 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
@@ -98,6 +98,12 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return !!(vcpu->arch.pending_exceptions);
 }
 
+bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel);
+
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	return 1;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index 1a75c0b..6184c45 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -58,6 +58,12 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
 	return !!(v->arch.pending_exceptions) || kvm_request_pending(v);
 }
 
+bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel);
+
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	return 1;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c b/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c
index ce865bd..4ea8c38 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static int __diag_time_slice_end(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 5, "%s", "diag time slice end");
 	vcpu->stat.diagnose_44++;
-	kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu);
+	kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(vcpu));
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index af09d34..0b0c689 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -2447,6 +2447,12 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return kvm_s390_vcpu_has_irq(vcpu, 0);
 }
 
+bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel);
+
 void kvm_s390_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	atomic_or(PROG_BLOCK_SIE, &vcpu->arch.sie_block->prog20);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
index 337b6d2..cd0e6e6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
@@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	switch (code) {
 	case HVCALL_NOTIFY_LONG_SPIN_WAIT:
-		kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu);
+		kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(vcpu));
 		break;
 	case HVCALL_POST_MESSAGE:
 	case HVCALL_SIGNAL_EVENT:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 1107626..e6ed24e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -3749,7 +3749,9 @@ static int interrupt_window_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 
 static int pause_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 {
-	kvm_vcpu_on_spin(&(svm->vcpu));
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &(svm->vcpu);
+
+	kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(vcpu));
 	return 1;
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 9b21b12..9d6223a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -6761,7 +6761,7 @@ static int handle_pause(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (ple_gap)
 		grow_ple_window(vcpu);
 
-	kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu);
+	kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(vcpu));
 	return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index d734aa8..4430be6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -8439,6 +8439,12 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return kvm_vcpu_running(vcpu) || kvm_vcpu_has_events(vcpu);
 }
 
+bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel);
+
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	return kvm_vcpu_exiting_guest_mode(vcpu) == IN_GUEST_MODE;
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 21a6fd6..91460aa 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ int kvm_vcpu_write_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, const void *data,
 bool kvm_vcpu_wake_up(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_vcpu_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 int kvm_vcpu_yield_to(struct kvm_vcpu *target);
-void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool me_in_kern);
 void kvm_load_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_put_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
@@ -800,6 +800,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void);
 void kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *rtn);
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
 #ifndef __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VM_ALLOC
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index a39a1e1..862f820 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -416,6 +416,11 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
 		&& !v->arch.power_off && !v->arch.pause);
 }
 
+bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 /* Just ensure a guest exit from a particular CPU */
 static void exit_vm_noop(void *info)
 {
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 15252d7..e7720d2 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -2317,7 +2317,7 @@ static bool kvm_vcpu_eligible_for_directed_yield(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 #endif
 }
 
-void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me)
+void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me, bool me_in_kern)
 {
 	struct kvm *kvm = me->kvm;
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
@@ -2348,6 +2348,8 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me)
 				continue;
 			if (swait_active(&vcpu->wq) && !kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu))
 				continue;
+			if (me_in_kern && !kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(vcpu))
+				continue;
 			if (!kvm_vcpu_eligible_for_directed_yield(vcpu))
 				continue;
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-08  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-08  4:05 [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin Longpeng(Mike)
2017-08-08  4:05 ` Longpeng(Mike) [this message]
2017-08-08  7:34   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: add spinlock optimization framework Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-08  7:43     ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-08  8:42   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-08  8:44     ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-08  9:00     ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-08  9:35       ` Longpeng (Mike)
2017-08-08  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: X86: implement the logic for spinlock optimization Longpeng(Mike)
2017-08-08  7:30   ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-08  8:31     ` Longpeng (Mike)
2017-08-08  8:39       ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-08  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: s390: implements the kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel() Longpeng(Mike)
2017-08-08  7:37   ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-08  8:35   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-08  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: arm: " Longpeng(Mike)
2017-08-08  7:39   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-08  7:41     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-08  7:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin Cornelia Huck
2017-08-08  8:14   ` Longpeng (Mike)
2017-08-10 13:18     ` Eric Farman
2017-08-11  1:43       ` Longpeng (Mike)
2017-08-11  7:19       ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-08 11:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-08 11:30   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-08 11:49   ` Longpeng (Mike)
2017-08-08 11:50     ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1502165135-4784-2-git-send-email-longpeng2@huawei.com \
    --to=longpeng2@huawei.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.com \
    --cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longpeng.mike@gmail.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=weidong.huang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®