From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753887AbdHIQcv (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:32:51 -0400 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:35694 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752559AbdHIQct (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:32:49 -0400 Message-ID: <1502296367.3602.26.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the scsi tree From: James Bottomley To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 09:32:47 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <20170809092730.1138bf7e@canb.auug.org.au> <1502235696.2736.120.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 12:24 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > James, > > > > > Yes we had to drop a commit which proved problematic in the fixes > > tree. > > I'm still not sure why you decided to rebase instead of waiting for > me to drop the patch. That's how we usually do it... We can certainly do it that way around.  If you want to rebase to drop the patch, I can set the top of the fixes tree to your rebase.  James