From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932162AbdIGSO7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:14:59 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:44581 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755781AbdIGSO6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:14:58 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,359,1500966000"; d="scan'208";a="1192698450" Message-ID: <1504808096.13310.12.camel@tzanussi-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 21/40] tracing: Generalize per-element hist trigger data From: Tom Zanussi To: Steven Rostedt Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mhiramat@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, vedang.patel@intel.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, joel.opensrc@gmail.com, joelaf@google.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, baohong.liu@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 13:14:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170907135621.036d4b5a@gandalf.local.home> References: <20170907135621.036d4b5a@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-4.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 13:56 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:57:33 -0500 > Tom Zanussi wrote: > [...] > > hist_data->map = tracing_map_create(map_bits, hist_data->key_size, > > map_ops, hist_data); > > @@ -1724,7 +1722,8 @@ static void hist_trigger_stacktrace_print(struct seq_file *m, > > seq_printf(m, "%s: [%llx] %-55s", field_name, > > uval, str); > > } else if (key_field->flags & HIST_FIELD_FL_EXECNAME) { > > - char *comm = elt->private_data; > > + struct hist_elt_data *elt_data = elt->private_data; > > I wonder if we should have a return WARN_ON_ONCE(!elt_data); here just > in case. > Yeah, that makes sense, as do the other suggestions above, will update. Thanks, Tom